If PBF/JMM is a mismatch, then PBF/PAC is one to.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TredKiller
    Not the Critic who Counts
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 4538
    • 183
    • 180
    • 11,853

    #11
    i actually think JMM has a better chance to beat PBF then Pac, becuse pac's style is almost completely taylor maid for floyd.

    Comment

    • Kalion
      Boxing Scene's Spartacus
      • Jul 2006
      • 1493
      • 73
      • 16
      • 7,983

      #12
      Originally posted by GetSumBrah
      yea, against a 38 year old cuban who was almost knocked out through the ropes vs katsidis, soundly beaten by santa cruz before marquez got to him. & baby bull who stil has baby fat, & is probably the lightest hitting lightweight, rocked marquez, what does that tell you?
      This is an prime example of the type of contradictions that are made by so many posters on a daily basis.

      When JMM beat Casa and Diaz was that your first reaction? Or did you give him praise for it? Now because hes about to fight PBF all of a sudden nothing he has done means **** anymore. Just in a effort to subtract credit from a win for PBF.

      Comment

      • shade darkar
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 6460
        • 227
        • 337
        • 12,996

        #13
        Originally posted by Kalion
        Everytime there is a thread about PBF/JMM theres a ton of people claiming this is a one sided mismatch, PBF will destroy JMM with little effort, PBF should be ashamed for taking this fight ETC... All this and hes fighting the guy who is #2 p4p and arguably beat the p4p king of the sport right now twice.
        Look at it this way.


        If PBF>>>>>>>>>JMM
        and JMM is considered to be PAC>=JMM
        when compared to PAC.
        Then how the hell can you say PAC<<<<<<<<
        So if we all agree that PBF/JMM is a mismatch
        Then we must agree PBF/PAC would also be one.

        Agree or disagree?

        this is simple. pacquiao is about half a stone in natural body mass heavier than marquez. well thats what emmanuel steward thinks anyway!

        Comment

        • El Chicano
          Juan Hitter Quitter
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 10997
          • 375
          • 378
          • 17,954

          #14
          It's "too" not "to"...

          Comment

          • Foodie One
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 1871
            • 130
            • 10
            • 5,049

            #15
            Originally posted by Kalion
            Everytime there is a thread about PBF/JMM theres a ton of people claiming this is a one sided mismatch, PBF will destroy JMM with little effort, PBF should be ashamed for taking this fight ETC... All this and hes fighting the guy who is #2 p4p and arguably beat the p4p king of the sport right now twice.
            Look at it this way.


            If PBF>>>>>>>>>JMM
            and JMM is considered to be PAC>=JMM
            when compared to PAC.
            Then how the hell can you say PAC<<<<<<<<


            So if we all agree that PBF/JMM is a mismatch
            Then we must agree PBF/PAC would also be one.

            Agree or disagree?
            The Pacman will be too much for Mayweather. JAT




            Comment

            • DonTaseMeBrah
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 5828
              • 683
              • 575
              • 6,409

              #16
              Originally posted by Kalion
              This is an prime example of the type of contradictions that are made by so many posters on a daily basis.

              When JMM beat Casa and Diaz was that your first reaction? Or did you give him praise for it? Now because hes about to fight PBF all of a sudden nothing he has done means **** anymore. Just in a effort to subtract credit from a win for PBF.

              You created a thread If PBF/JMM is a mismatch, then PBF/PAC is one to.

              The reason why that is wrong is that in 3 fights above 130 (135,140,147) pac has dominated, looked good, has ko power, marquez even though he ko'd both fighters at 135, didnt look so dominant vs casa (a close fight up until the ko), vs baby bull a light hitting lightweight clearly rocked marquez. Now marquez is taking on a former 154 & 147 pound champion.

              Do you not see the difference? Or do you just want reaffirmation of your own opinion?
              Last edited by DonTaseMeBrah; 08-13-2009, 12:49 PM.

              Comment

              • Kalion
                Boxing Scene's Spartacus
                • Jul 2006
                • 1493
                • 73
                • 16
                • 7,983

                #17
                Originally posted by GetSumBrah
                You created a thread If PBF/JMM is a mismatch, then PBF/PAC is one to.

                The reason why that is wrong is that in 3 fights above 130 (135,140,147) pac has dominated, looked good, has ko power, marquez even though he ko'd both fighters at 135, didnt look so dominant vs casa (a close fight up until the ko), vs baby bull a light hitting lightweight clearly rocked marquez. Now marquez is taking on a former 154 & 147 pound champion.

                Do you not see the difference? Or do you just want reaffirmation of your own opinion?
                So the only reason you are slating this to be a mismatch is purely on size?

                Comment

                • solo20
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 3821
                  • 190
                  • 303
                  • 22,297

                  #18
                  Originally posted by TredKiller
                  i actually think JMM has a better chance to beat PBF then Pac, becuse pac's style is almost completely taylor maid for floyd.
                  you got it. its only the *******s saying some how Pac has a better chance at beating Floyd when Pac had trouble beating JMM. Floyd might be a better smarter fighter then JMM. we will see when they fight. Floyd has a longer reach to keep Pac out of range and doesnt gas out and better footspeed . only a boxer with great boxing skills is going to beat Floyd but then agine this is boxing and anything can happen

                  Comment

                  • DonTaseMeBrah
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 5828
                    • 683
                    • 575
                    • 6,409

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Kalion
                    So the only reason you are slating this to be a mismatch is purely on size?
                    when did i ever slate this to be a mismatch?

                    i actually think marquez will do okay. he wont get dominated like gatti, but he still wont win. he will get outdecisioned.

                    Comment

                    • 2501
                      upinurgirlsguts
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 20211
                      • 902
                      • 49
                      • 28,237

                      #20
                      Pacquiao has had 2 fights at 140 + in which he completely analy ****d his competition which was either good or better than average. Those credentials are enough to make him a possible competitive opponent for a former RING and WBC undisputed WW champion.

                      Marquez has had 0 fights at 140 or above. Let me repeat that once more, Marquez has had 0 fights at 140 or above. He's only had 2 fights at 135. Yet he will be facing the former RING and WBC undisputed WW champion.

                      Mayweather fans are all about numbers and figures. They want to prove a point, they bust out his record, number of titles in diff divisions, amount of money he makes, PPV numbers. Well, those are the numbers regarding this matter. Which one seems more like a mismatch?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP