Exactly. This garbage about Pac being a 106 pound fighter is ******. He was 16 when he weighed that much. When he was 21, aka the age Cotto's career began, he was over 120 pounds already.
By the way Xplosivo, where have you been?
damn i get it now. i see your point, but explain it to the *******s. for the record i think cotto should be able to ko pacquiao within 3 rounds, if he doesn't then it is a shame considering this is a welterweight bout, cotto will be comfortable unlike DLH.
damn i get it now. i see your point, but explain it to the *******s. for the record i think cotto should be able to ko pacquiao within 3 rounds, if he doesn't then it is a shame considering this is a welterweight bout, cotto will be comfortable unlike DLH.
Pacquiao has a great chin. I don't think there's shame in losing to him at all, even if you're Miguel Cotto.
I know Pacquiao is an elf. Cotto should step on him.
I mean skill and athleticism has nothing to do with anything. It's all about how much you weigh at the beginning of your career. That's the main determining factor when it comes to legacy.
answer my question: does cotto have any excuse losing to anyone under 147 lbs???
pac officially weighed 138 lbs against hatton, cotto officially weighed 146 lbs against clottey. pac ain't no WW.
So ****ing what? If he isn't a WW then fight Mosley or Bradley at LWW, simple as. I haven't ever seen Cotto begging for Pac to come up to WW, Cotto set his limit for 145 and Pac (finally) agreed.
guns dont kill people, people kill people. size dont win fights, fighters win fights.
LOFL so why should Cotto be embarased if he dosent ko PAC? iF size dosent matter then whats the reason? Are you saying that Cotto is that much better than PAC skill wise?
Tweet
Comment