What Does a COTTO Win over MANNY PACQUIAO Mean?

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

So I guess you think Mayweather win over hatton was a great defense of his welterweight title and was a big legacy fight for him, because Hatton was already the king of the division Below and he already a champion and fought at WW.. and furthermore Since hatton was a former welterweight champion since Hatton challenge him .. that mean you never had a problem with Floyd defending his WW title against Hatton...

But i know you would not be indicating that would you after all the past things you said about floyd fighting hatton?

Dont Play that **** with me.

When Floyd Fought hatton it was a pure Money fight. Floyd had other choices like Cotto,Mosley,ect,ect,ect, but He chose hatton.

This time theres no ther choice for Cotto than To fight pacquiao.

And Pacquiao destroyed the guy he fought at WW hatton got owned and got a gift descicion.

Pacquiao has prove he is a better fighter than hatton.

And it was good win for Mayweather, but not as big as Pacquiao would be for Cotto.

Thats how ****s works, who you beat, how, when and where.

[DonTaseMeBrah]

How does this make sense?

the weight disparity between the fighters lessens the win for cotto is what he's trying to say.

It doesnt make sense just like boats are not great investments huh hor**** errr i mean horus.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

GTFOH. You're so transparent your posts should come with a bottle of Windex. Beating Pac is a great win for Cotto and a far better one than Floyd's win over Hatton.

Ah ****, ROFLMAO jajajajaajajajajaajjaa

[IMDAZED]

I understand what compare and contrast is.
But some of you guys dont know what a comparison is let alone how to contrast...

btw, I didnt know you were Danny Gunz..

Anyways the point at hand is What Does a Welterweight win over a Junior Welterweight really mean when the fight is at Welterweight?

therefore What does a Cotto win over Pacquiao mean since the fight is at Welterweight

You think Danny Gunz are one and the same because we apply common sense.

And I already told you what I thought it meant - an excellent win, certainly much better than beating Hatton .

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Yeah we do, and you're full of ****, Horus.

Ricky Hatton had already moved up to welter and barely sc****d by a lower rung 147lber. Manny Pacquiao is an ATG, HOF'er who is currently ranked the best in the world. The only way Hatton sniffs Canastota is if Joe Calzaghe invites him.

Damn braw, you are on a roll, LMAO jajajajjaja

[Horus]

Dont Play that **** with me.

When Floyd Fought hatton it was a pure Money fight. Floyd had other choices like Cotto,Mosley,ect,ect,ect, but He chose hatton.

This time theres no ther choice for Cotto than To fight pacquiao.

And Pacquiao destroyed the guy he fought at WW hatton got owned and got a gift descicion.

Pacquiao has prove he is a better fighter than hatton.

And it was good win for Mayweather, but not as big as Pacquiao would be for Cotto.

Thats how ****s works, who you beat, how, when and where.

Berto is not available ?
Williams hasnt called out Cotto?(RECENTLY)
Mosley is not available along with the Welterweight ring championship fight?
Cintron is not available and asking for a fight?
Margarito is not available? (although **** Margs..)
Clottey doesn't derserve a rematch?
Collazo doesn't deserve a shot?

What happen to if you fight within the Welterweight division you should fight welterweights?

what happen to that logic?

[Horus]

You think Danny Gunz are one and the same because we apply common sense.

And I already told you what I thought it meant - an excellent win, certainly much better than beating Hatton .

So beating a blown up lightweight at welterweight is a great win now...
so what does beating a great welterweight at welterweight mean now a super great win?

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Yes I do and, better than that, I know you. Your threads - directly or indirectly - revolve around your crush.

LMAO

[Horus]

Why must ts resort to using racist avatars.

who's avi are you talking about?

[jose1418]

i can respect being consistent

don't know what you mean, but this is what I posted before.

Originally Posted by Horus
What does it mean For Cotto to force Pacquiao to move up to Welterweight just to fight him...?
Cotto didn't ask for this fight, Pac did and he wants the belt

Why didnt Cotto move down to 140 if he wanted to fight Pacquiao?
Why is he forcing Pacquiao to moved up to welterweight...when Pacquiao weightclass is 140?
again, cotto didn't ask for the fight, pac did and he wants the belt

What does that win mean for has legacy...
Should he just have fought berto or williams?

IMO Cotto if he win, he should've win, he is the bigger guy,
and on your last question, he should fight Mosley or Clottey rematch instead of this fight.