What Does a COTTO Win over MANNY PACQUIAO Mean?

[Horus]

Mirror much? You pull out blown up lightweight like that answers everything. Why are you so dense? Do you pre-write all these letters defending Floyd? I sure hope you're getting a check.

what is your definition of a blown up lightweight?

[IMDAZED]

what is your definition of a blown up lightweight?

A lightweight who moves up but is unable to have success in the higher division because of the weight gain.

Womp womp.

[Horus]

A lightweight who moves up but is unable to have success in the higher division because of the weight gain.

Womp womp.

So why would you say "Wladimir Klitschko is a blown up lightweight"

[IMDAZED]

So why would you say "Wladimir Klitschko is a blown up lightweight"

Don't think too hard, some things will go over your head. A better question is, using that definition, what's Ricky Hatton? Pacquiao? Go for it...without referring to some old prose you pre-wrote, of course.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Another fun fact, that teh Copy/Paste man forgot is that, when Floyd fought hatton he was teh favorite to win, Cotto is the underdog and a big one, according to most experts!!!!

[Guest]

Historically, it would be a great win.
Perhaps, for the next few years people would quibble about a smaller guy moving up, but you'll notice throughout history, the name rather than the weight division, tends to improve a fighter's legacy greatly.

[IMDAZED]

Another fun fact, that teh Copy/Paste man forgot is that, when Floyd fought hatton he was teh favorite to win, Cotto is the underdog and a big one, according to most experts!!!!

Maybe that's because Hatton couldn't even touch Pacquiao's bootstraps. Well actually he could've from the mat...

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Maybe that's because Hatton couldn't even touch Pacquiao's bootstraps. Well actually he could've from the mat...

LMAO jajajajajajja

[BawK]

Dont compared nobody in this era to henry armstrong.. especially fighters who fight at catchweights

By your logic, Henry Armstrong should not be fighting above or lower his
own division

So does Duran, Leonard & Hearns etc........

[DonTaseMeBrah]

Historically, it would be a great win.
Perhaps, for the next few years people would quibble about a smaller guy moving up, but you'll notice throughout history, the name rather than the weight division, tends to improve a fighter's legacy greatly.

co sign jreck.

with the advancement of technology & the creation of post your comments under each internet article, every single salmon swimming in a stream of ******ity becomes the gore vidal of boxing like our friend Hours.

Try telling

-Marvin Hagler beating Duran his win is not great

-Aaron Pryor beating Arguello is not a great win

-Carlos Monzon beating Jose Napoles is not a great win

-Max Schmelling beating Mickey Walker is not a great win

-Tommy Hearns beating Duran is not a great win

-Salvador Sanchez beating Wilfredo Benitez is not a great win

-Pernell Whitaker beating Azumah Nelson is not a great win



......because you know according to Horse**** i mean Horus they are not in their "ideal" "perfect" division or are "blown up."