Khan Not Interested in Hatton, Eyes American Dream

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Weebler I
    El Weeblerito I
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 31092
    • 1,459
    • 1,648
    • 54,550

    #51
    Originally posted by Dave Rado
    No, until very recently, Khan was saying that he didn't want to fight Hatton because they are friends. Then after a lot of media speculation about the fight, he said that if the public demanded the fight he'd be willing to take it, but that he'd leave it to the promoters.

    Roach was not exactly pushing for it either, he only said Khan may fight Hatton "somewhere down the line". He never said anything about fighting Hatton in the near future.
    No fcukstick, Roach was going on about Khan fighting Hatton since before the Pac fight.

    No, just opinion.
    No, it's fact. Kid ain't hard enough.

    Comment

    • Dave Rado
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 8064
      • 266
      • 453
      • 14,460

      #52
      Originally posted by PhillyG
      At what point did I do that?.
      Try reading your original post. You claimed that Khan isn't as good as Calzaghe or Hatton because he hasn't yet beaten anyone as good as Tszyu or Lacy.

      Comment

      • Dave Rado
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 8064
        • 266
        • 453
        • 14,460

        #53
        Originally posted by The Weebler II
        No fcukstick, Roach was going on about Khan fighting Hatton since before the Pac fight.
        Yet you can't provide a single link to back up your claims!! And then you have the cheek to throw insults around.

        Originally posted by The Weebler II
        No, it's fact. Kid ain't hard enough.
        You should try looking up the word "fact" in the dictionary. You obviously have no idea what the word means.

        Comment

        • PhillyG
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 34
          • 2
          • 0
          • 6,060

          #54
          Originally posted by Dave Rado
          Try reading your original post. You claimed that Khan isn't as good as Calzaghe or Hatton because he hasn't yet beaten anyone as good as Tszyu or Lacy.
          My original post in its entirety. Doesnt even mention Khan. Are you really this ****** or is this an act?

          My original post defends both hatton and calzaghe for the wins against Lacy and Tszyu. Who YOU said were past it. Who YOU misquoted records. You are still missing the point entirely. Dave do yourself a favour and re-read this thread from when I first posted. Read it a few times because its obviously hard for you to take this stuff in. Then hopefully you will see like everyone else can what a fool you are making of yourself.

          Originally posted by PhillyG
          Thats a typical example of why i try to avoid boxing forums.

          Someone who is obviously new to the game talking garbage with enough conviction to believe its gospel.

          Best wins against past their best fighters like Jeff Lacy who at the time was 21-0-0 a champion and 'americas next big thing' or perhaps Kessler? who is universally recognised as the number 1 supermiddleight NOW.

          Kostya Tszyu on a thirteen fight winning streak and only beaten once prior, Castillo only a couple of fights after his demolition of corrales?

          I think people who have opinions should at least let them be informed ones.

          Comment

          • D-MiZe
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 25073
            • 1,061
            • 371
            • 75,542

            #55
            Khan beats Hatton now.

            Comment

            • Dave Rado
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 8064
              • 266
              • 453
              • 14,460

              #56
              Originally posted by PhillyG
              Who YOU said were past it. Who YOU misquoted records.
              You criticise me for misunderstanding your original post, but then accuse me of saying things that I haven't said. Show me one post where I said Lacy or even Tszyu were past it. And show me one post in which I misquoted anyone's record.

              Originally posted by PhillyG
              You are still missing the point entirely.
              Okay I misunderstood your post, apologies. There were so many irrational anti-Khan hater posts in this thread that I read things into your post that weren't there, in a knee-jerk reaction. I thought you were trying to put down Khan.

              Comment

              • PhillyG
                Up and Comer
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 34
                • 2
                • 0
                • 6,060

                #57
                Originally posted by Dave Rado
                And winning streak or not, Tszyu was past his prime, as was Castillo.
                Originally posted by Dave Rado
                Show me one post where I said Lacy or even Tszyu were past it.
                Originally posted by Dave Rado
                And show me one post in which I misquoted anyone's record.
                It was more the the wrongful corrections of the record examples I laid out which were right, it was arrogant and frustrating seen as they were already right in the first place.


                Originally posted by Dave Rado
                Okay I misunderstood your post, apologies. There were so many irrational anti-Khan hater posts in this thread that I read things into your post that weren't there, in a knee-jerk reaction. I thought you were trying to put down Khan.
                Apology accepted I'm not here to argue. But I'll stand firm, especially if I'm right. I'll also be the first to hold my hand up if I'm wrong. But well done for not carrying it on.

                I wasn't hating on Khan. The whole issue was the fella who basically implied Hatton and Calzaghe had only ever beaten has beens which is clearly bs. Hatton/Calzaghe up to this point have achieved far more than Khan has. Khan's future is in his and Roach's hands. Sky's the limit?

                I do feel slightly aggrieved that Hatton hasnt got the recognition he deserves for his achievements. Calzaghe has but only really by the people who live and breath boxing. Combined record of 91-2-0 with 64 ko's. Defeated countless champions and respectively 12 and 8 straight years of holding world belts. Some serious credit is due for that.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP