Mayweather would be smart to start doing the same thing Nards did, and it seems like he's going to. Next stop for Money, a fight against the tiny ****sexual legend JMM. The criminal popkins would approve of Money May's choice for an opponent.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nards resume kinda sucks
Collapse
-
Originally posted by CottoFanatic View PostMayweather would be smart to start doing the same thing Nards did, and it seems like he's going to. Next stop for Money, a fight against the tiny ****sexual legend JMM. The criminal popkins would approve of Money May's choice for an opponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Jesus View PostName these 5 World Champs that he allegedly ducked?
Chris Eubank - WBO 168 champ for 5 years, 1990 - 1995
Dariusz Michalczewski - WBO 175 champ for a whole 9 years, 1994 - 2003
Gerald Mcclellan - WBC 160 champ ( When he was Roys #1 contender for Roy,He did his usual thing and jumped a division)
Frankie Liles - WBA 168 champ, 1994 - 1999
Steve Collins - WBO 168 champ, 1995 - 1997(Called Roy out numerous times in the press,always ignored by Roy.
While Roy ducked FOUR of these fighters at 168,lets take a look at who he actually fought
James Toney (weight-drained beyond belief)
Antoine Byrd (who?)
Vinny Pazienza (blown up lightweight)
Tony Thornton(LMAO)
Eric Lucas(LOL)
Bryant Brannon(who?)
Comment
-
Originally posted by flyest1 View PostMonzon- Griffith and Napoles were WW. THOSE WERE 2 OF HIS BIGGEST TWINS
Hagler- Leonard, Duran, and Hearns-Those were WW and three of his biggest fights
Originally posted by CottoFanatic View PostMayweather would be smart to start doing the same thing Nards did, and it seems like he's going to. Next stop for Money, a fight against the tiny ****sexual legend JMM. The criminal popkins would approve of Money May's choice for an opponent.
Originally posted by elephant man View PostNigel Benn - WBC 168 champ for 4 years, 1992 - 1996 (Battered Roys boy G-man,Roy wanted none of him)
Chris Eubank - WBO 168 champ for 5 years, 1990 - 1995
Dariusz Michalczewski - WBO 175 champ for a whole 9 years, 1994 - 2003
Gerald Mcclellan - WBC 160 champ ( When he was Roys #1 contender for Roy,He did his usual thing and jumped a division)
Frankie Liles - WBA 168 champ, 1994 - 1999
Steve Collins - WBO 168 champ, 1995 - 1997(Called Roy out numerous times in the press,always ignored by Roy.
While Roy ducked FOUR of these fighters at 168,lets take a look at who he actually fought
James Toney (weight-drained beyond belief)
Antoine Byrd (who?)
Vinny Pazienza (blown up lightweight)
Tony Thornton(LMAO)
Eric Lucas(LOL)
Bryant Brannon(who?)
Comment
-
Originally posted by chicano79us View PostLol says the Oscar fan.
When have I denied Chavez was out of his prime?? You guys talk **** about Oscar's big fights, well his 2 with Chavez were big fights, whether you like it or not.
But yet that coked up past prime fighter was #1 P4P right?? Like I said Oscar fought him EARLY in his career. Nice try.
LMAO!! This is pathetic.
I admit he lost, but hey he got robbed in 2 fights so its even.
But most of us don't forget he schooled him for 9 rounds.
Shane had to cheat in the 2nd fight and lost in my eyes. Even if he got the win.
Oscar did not fight pernell early in his career. Whitakers prime was at lightweight not welterweight.
Oscar did school tito but he's an idiot for throwing it away.
Comment
-
Originally posted by elephant man View PostThis man has everyone believing he's great. It's not true. The guys 'best' wins have come against fighters tailor made for himself or against fighters outside there best weight category. Every elite fighter AT there best weight that he has fought, have beaten him, close and disputed or not, he has never done enough to win.
Over the years he has collected losses against Clinton Mitchell (which can be excused), Roy Jones Jr, Jermain Taylor twice, and Joe Calzaghe.
Now whilst losses against these fighters is not disgraceful, the man is still placed above them by many fans, in particular Calzaghe and Roy Jones? How can this be? He lost against the two fighters who are always being compared against him, as to who the best fighter between 160-175 of this generation has been. By process of elimination, Hopkins is clearly below both due to the fact he lost to them. No ifs or buts, his name is on Jones' and Calzaghes resume therefore is below them. Also before we get the Nard nuthuggers coming in saying he didnt actually lose to Joe. Guess what, he did, he started feigning low blows and couldn't keep up with the pace, and lost a close but clear decision.
Now, onto his wins. On paper he has some very good names on his resume, but the majority of these are just that, decent on paper.
His two biggest wins came against blown up welterweights in DLH and Tito, and anyone with half a brain knew they would lose. Tito may have destroyed Joppy, but the guy was not elite at 160, he was elite at 147. Same goes for De La Hoya, despite the fact it was fought at a catchweight of 156, he still had no business being in the ring with Hopkins, the naturally much bigger man.
Kelly Pavlik and Winky Wright. With all due respect are very good fighters, but both fought outside of there best weights, and to add to this, Pavlik was sick/ill. Winky, a blown up junior middleweight fighting against Hopkins at very near on Light Heavyweight, a fat puffed up version of the man who dominated light middleweight. Pavlik to add to this, was always overhyped, and is a come forward slugger, someone who's style is tailor made for Hopkins.
Glen Johnson and Tarver, two RIDICULOUSLY overrated fighters. Johnson is a come forward slugger, and was embarassed by Hopkins. Tarver has just never been much good.
And that's it.
Now this isn't to bash on the abilities and skills of Hopkins, as the man is a very good fighter, however, his resume does not put him Calzaghe.
Comment
Comment