Timothy Bradley's arrogance-***** move or no?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • T-97
    BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 14808
    • 566
    • 628
    • 22,958

    #31
    Nate Campbell; "I'm not mad with Tim, he did his job".

    Comment

    • Khalid X
      The Truth *********
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 11976
      • 691
      • 531
      • 20,762

      #32
      Originally posted by Joe Kapp
      I think people forget that watching a replay in slow motion is a million times easier than watching the live action.

      There was no blood immediately after the butt and didn't appear until moments later when Campbell was on the ropes.
      exactly. no blood at first. I mean its debatable as to did the head butt do it alone, did the headbutt soften it up and the punch busted it open etc. But all of this is a mute point because Nate clearly wanted out. After his cutman told him he was alright Nate said "LISTEN JIMMY stop the fight!)

      Comment

      • joseph5620
        undisputed
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 15628
        • 3,082
        • 5,652
        • 71,615

        #33
        Originally posted by skullduggery
        Was it a ***** move for timothy bradley to act like he won fair and square? Or do you think he won fair and square..... I personally think it was very unsportsman like, and he is now a ***** in my book.....

        I don't blame Bradley. I blame the spineless ref who was either incompetent and ignorant or just a shady hometown ref. Bradley's job is to fight and that's it. I was pulling for Bradley because he is a So Cal fighter. But fair is fair and the fight should be won in the right way.

        Comment

        • joseph5620
          undisputed
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 15628
          • 3,082
          • 5,652
          • 71,615

          #34
          Originally posted by mikedb1984
          exactly. no blood at first. I mean its debatable as to did the head butt do it alone, did the headbutt soften it up and the punch busted it open etc. But all of this is a mute point because Nate clearly wanted out. After his cutman told him he was alright Nate said "LISTEN JIMMY stop the fight!)
          The "punch" was clearly blocked by Campbell's glove and Bradley is no big puncher who bust people up with one punch anyway. As far as the cut, maybe it could have been stopped but the issue was his sight. If he couldn't see, he couldn't see and there should be no debating that.

          Comment

          • Kobe Bryant
            lefhooktodabody
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2006
            • 5319
            • 165
            • 2
            • 14,366

            #35
            Why would it be? He said it perfect last night. He's a fighter that's his job, if Campbell has a gripe take that **** to his promoters. It's not his job.

            He also said he understood where Campbell was coming from. If that's a ***** move than I guess all stand up guys are bitches.

            Comment

            • Walter Kovacs
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 125
              • 18
              • 7
              • 206

              #36
              if this is what black fighters are talking about boxing then pacquiao might not as well fight them because the way they fought and the way they ***** is fuucking disappointing.

              Comment

              • joseph5620
                undisputed
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 15628
                • 3,082
                • 5,652
                • 71,615

                #37
                Originally posted by Joe Kapp
                I think people forget that watching a replay in slow motion is a million times easier than watching the live action.

                There was no blood immediately after the butt and didn't appear until moments later when Campbell was on the ropes.
                It didn't "appear" until he took his gloves away from his face. There's a difference between that and what you're saying.

                Comment

                • BoxingChaos
                  Ambiguous
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 4596
                  • 311
                  • 272
                  • 11,182

                  #38
                  Originally posted by VatoMulatto
                  Tim won fair and sqaure the only one guilty of a ***** move was Campbell.

                  I mean, how are you gonna enter the ring playing "Thunderstruck" to honor Arturo Gatti and then quit like a *****? That **** don't make any sense.
                  Exactly, he said he could not see but he stuck around for at least a half an hour crying. He put Bradley on the spot.

                  As soon as Campbell went to his corner, he gave up, he did not allow his cut man to even work on the eye.

                  Campbell did not want to fight with the cut, he was already at a disadvantage. He still went out like a punk though. Bradley would have beat him had the fight gone on. I had Bradley wining every round. Had this gone to the next round and Campbell bails, the fight would have gone to the score cards and Campbell knows it. He did not want that belt enough to continue fighting but he sure wanted that No Contest. He put up more of fight arguing about the decisions than he did while actually fighting vs Bradley.

                  Comment

                  • Spacey1991
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 8885
                    • 247
                    • 282
                    • 18,684

                    #39
                    Originally posted by skullduggery
                    Was it a ***** move for timothy bradley to act like he won fair and square? Or do you think he won fair and square..... I personally think it was very unsportsman like, and he is now a ***** in my book.....
                    So he is a ***** because he said he won fairly, even if it was controversial it doesn't make him a *****... I haven't got to see it yet but by the sounds of it Bradley was taking the fight anyway... just because he thought he won fairly doesn't make him a *****, I mean what did you expect him to do?

                    Comment

                    • joseph5620
                      undisputed
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 15628
                      • 3,082
                      • 5,652
                      • 71,615

                      #40
                      [QUOTE=DannyChaos;5817417]Exactly, he said he could not see but he stuck around for at least a half an hour crying. He put Bradley on the spot.

                      As soon as Campbell went to his corner, he gave up, he did not allow his cut man to even work on the eye.

                      Apparently you still don't know the difference between being cut and vision problems.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP