Timothy Bradley's arrogance-***** move or no?
Collapse
-
-
Anyone who officially wins regardless, after months of training, need to be given the benefit of the doubt.
If he wants to celebrate or rub it in, that`s his personal choice. Whichever way you look at it, he is still undefeated and still has his crown, anyway.Last edited by ThunderWolf; 08-02-2009, 11:57 PM.Comment
-
You want to know what was really ******?In the words of Tim Bradley "We did BOSS !!!" you guys can't tell me that **** wasn't ******..........bradley is just a losts puppet who gets told what to do by gary shaw but hey the man can fight but how could you guys say he was beating campbells ass ? How many tims have we seen a fight be one way but turn the other way after 5 rounds ? huh i'm sure we have all seen fights like that so you can't judge **** that has happened in only 3 rounds....well thats unless its any old old tyson fight
Nate Campbell telling his corner to stop the fight before they even had a chance to work on the cut, or before even having the doctor look at it or even examine Nate.
"stop the fight, stop the fight".
He quit, bottom line.Comment
-
i lost a tad bit of respect for bradley after the fight. for a guy that touts himself as a holy roller and an honest and humble man, he sure showed a different side of him when he was capitulating on out come of the fight due to an accidental head butt. if he acted truely how he talks about himself, he would've agreed that the cut was due to an accidental head butt and that it's up to the commission to over turn or make the ruling, instead he was talking trash, and hiding behind shaw, and gary shaw didn't show too much confidence in bradely when he avoided and wasn't willing to make an immediate rematch. typical shaw.
even if bradley was on his way to stopping campbell or what not, the outcome of the fight past four rounds isnt relevant because it should've been a no contest under the rules of boxing, under the sanctioned rules............ where is the fairness involved????Comment
-
i lost a tad bit of respect for bradley after the fight. for a guy that touts himself as a holy roller and an honest and humble man, he sure showed a different side of him when he was capitulating on out come of the fight due to an accidental head butt. if he acted truely how he talks about himself, he would've agreed that the cut was due to an accidental head butt and that it's up to the commission to over turn or make the ruling, instead he was talking trash, and hiding behind shaw, and gary shaw didn't show too much confidence in bradely when he avoided and wasn't willing to make an immediate rematch. typical shaw.
even if bradley was on his way to stopping campbell or what not, the outcome of the fight past four rounds isnt relevant because it should've been a no contest under the rules of boxing, under the sanctioned rules............ where is the fairness involved????
I never realized Bradleys post fight interview could have changed the outcome of the fight.Comment
-
Being 'classy' like that will just lose the appeal, as you first thing you will get asked is why you weren't unduly troubled at the time. Campbell does indeed know how **** works.Comment
-
no but he could've stood up for whats right and not whats just right for him, especially if he's a humble, god fearing man, that he claims. all im saying is that a little bit of honesty was needed and bradley took the selfish route, good for him, i still like bradley as a fighter and as a person, i just lost a tad bit of respect for him for not standing by his moral guns. unless he believes the untruth and denies what video can prove that it was a cut from a head butt. he acknowledged that it was a head butt, but he capitulated on the unfairness of the outcome, it looks better on his resume to have a tko vs a NC, yes, although technically y the rules the fight should've been called a No Contest, and i really hope that the CSAC actually owns up to their mistake and human error and abides by the rules they set to govern and change the ruling to a NC.
it wouldn't hurt bradley's career or his momentum if the fight was ruled properly. he could've stepped up as a class act and said go by the rules, and if they did, it would be a NC.
personally prior to the telecast, i was commenting on the fight being in california, and i said that the doctors get too involved with ending fights too quick. it seems like they over do it, like the people paid to see the ring side doctor do anything. as a fan i hate california fights, and would really advise promoters and fighters to stay out of california fights or have their CSAC get their act together to where they're somewhat respectable, because as of right now they've done a **** up job, and it keeps getting worse. all the way from the inspectors missing loaded gloves in margaritos dressing room, it was ****m richardson who noticed it, not the inspectors, all the way to poor officiating to down right negligence with the handling of the rules in the bradley vs campbell fight. fighters beware, the CSAC isnt doing their job.Last edited by deuce_drop; 08-03-2009, 02:23 AM.Comment
-
This bout should of been a NC and i believe it will be overturned soon. Nate knew what he was doing, and its a smart move on his part. you just went 3 rounds with Bradley and pretty much knew you were in for a long night..Nate got handled for 3 rounds and couldn't do ****...Now if Nate would of won all 3 rounds or if he had hurt or staggered bradley in those 3 rounds...there is no doubt in my mind he would of continued the fight,no doubt. Bradley did his job. no ***** move on his partComment
-
He did stand up for what is right.no but he could've stood up for whats right and not whats just right for him, especially if he's a humble, god fearing man, that he claims. all im saying is that a little bit of honesty was needed and bradley took the selfish route, good for him, i still like bradley as a fighter and as a person, i just lost a tad bit of respect for him for not standing by his moral guns. unless he believes the untruth and denies what video can prove that it was a cut from a head butt. he acknowledged that it was a head butt, but he capitulated on the unfairness of the outcome, it looks better on his resume to have a tko vs a NC, yes, although technically y the rules the fight should've been called a No Contest, and i really hope that the CSAC actually owns up to their mistake and human error and abides by the rules they set to govern and change the ruling to a NC.
it wouldn't hurt bradley's career or his momentum if the fight was ruled properly. he could've stepped up as a class act and said go by the rules, and if they did, it would be a NC.
personally prior to the telecast, i was commenting on the fight being in california, and i said that the doctors get too involved with ending fights too quick. it seems like they over do it, like the people paid to see the ring side doctor do anything. as a fan i hate california fights, and would really advise promoters and fighters to stay out of california fights or have their CSAC get their act together to where they're somewhat respectable, because as of right now they've done a **** up job, and it keeps getting worse. all the way from the inspectors missing loaded gloves in margaritos dressing room, it was ****m richardson who noticed it, not the inspectors, all the way to poor officiating to down right negligence with the handling of the rules in the bradley vs campbell fight. fighters beware, the CSAC isnt doing their job.
He said he would fight him again.
In Florida even.
As he said, he did his part. Hes not a ref, hes not a part of the commission, hes not a doctor.
Hes a fighter trying to win a fight.
Its not his fault Campbell tried to be slick and run out of the fight.
You can't even prove the cut was from the headbutt. There was no blood immediately after the butt, and it was quite a few seconds that had passed by before blood even began to show, after some other punches had already been thrown.
Is it Bradleys fault that Campbell was crying to get the fight stopped?Comment
Comment