Does Cotto have the right to call Hatton overrated?

[KingTito]

I'd say so. Cotto is better than Hatton anyway.

[The Noose]

Yes.

If we have the right, Cotto has the right.

I agree with him.

[Bogler]

Hatton needed a biased ref, 2 am start time and a 36 year old Kostya to win that fight. Hatton lost to Collazo. The Castillo win was against a clearly shot version. And Hatton has always been an "attraction"...

Watch his fights, they're unwatchable. The guy has no skill.

Cotto is right in his assessment. There is no comparison between the two.

Cotto is better in every way and all his wins were against prime guys and better guys than Hatton's ever fought.

that's your style jack. you can dissect cotto's resume the same way. but lets not go there, this isn't bashing either of the two's resume's but comparing them. cotto has the edge, but not enough imo to call hatton overrated.

[BOOMbip]

At least Hatton finished Malignaggi

Buddy Mcgirt finished Malignaggi...


Paulie was way worse for wear after the Cotto fight...and he said as much after the Hatton stoppage.

[Pretty Boy32]

Hatton needed a biased ref, 2 am start time and a 36 year old Kostya to win that fight. Hatton lost to Collazo. The Castillo win was against a clearly shot version. And Hatton has always been an "attraction"...

Watch his fights, they're unwatchable. The guy has no skill.

Cotto is right in his assessment. There is no comparison between the two.

Cotto is better in every way and all his wins were against prime guys and better guys than Hatton's ever fought.

HAHAH Your Red you fcukin ****!

[PAC-BOY]

Buddy Mcgirt finished Malignaggi...


Paulie was way worse for wear after the Cotto fight...and he said as much after the Hatton stoppage.

Thats your opinion...But the fact is ....Hatton did what Cotto didnt.

[Spirit]

At least Hatton finished Malignaggi

If you mean McGirt throwing in the towel like he does with all his fighters that dont do well then yes Hatton definitely finished Malignaggi

[Bogler]

Cotto's skill set and resume >>>> Hatton's skill set and resume.

what i said.

[BOOMbip]

that's your style jack. you can dissect cotto's resume the same way. but lets not go there, this isn't bashing either of the two's resume's but comparing them. cotto has the edge, but not enough imo to call hatton overrated.

You compare a win over Mosley...To Hatton's win over Tyzu?

Are you serious?...your logic is flawed...Thats like saying a win over William Joppy right now is the same or better then a win over Bhop...cause Bhop is older.

It's not about who is older...It's about who still has it...and clearly Shane Mosley WW champion still has it.

Anyway as for Cotto having the right to call Hatton over rated...




Yes if thats what he believes...

He has more of a right then I do to call Ricky Hatton is over rated...and I think Ricky Hatton is over rated.

and be you same standers who is Bogler to question the resume of Miguel Cotto.

So lets keep things in perspective, shall we.

[DonTaseMeBrah]

of course cotto has the right to call hatton overrated.

if we can call him overrated using the post comment button on boxingscene, i dont see why cotto cant.