Originally posted by DocG
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Team Pacquiao Made a Weighty Mistake With Cotto
Collapse
-
I think Roach is under estimating Cotto..thinking hes damaged goods and the extra 2 pounds is gonna take him off his game...i just dont see Pac putting up a performance like he did vs DLH or Hatton...if Cotto fought DLH or Hatton..we all know he'd cream them both..especially DLH lol..
DAMN I CANT WAIT.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rao007 View PostPersonally, I reserve judgment--I will have to see how well Pacquiao deals with BIG, fast, welterweight sparring partners and see what Roach has to say. I dont' see Pacquiao stoppping Cotto other than TKO via cuts. Pacquiao will have to dish out a perfect plan in order to get a UD--he has to be the smooth operator who consistently throws (unlike Zab Judah) while maintaining his aggressivness--he cannot be pushed into a brawl.
Originally posted by Organik View PostI disagree with the premise of this article, particularly that Team Pacquiao was erroneous in that they did not demand the fight take place at 143.
In spite of the suggestion by our UCLA graduate that most boxing fans have not had to make weight, I myself have done so for both wrestling and boxing competitions, and I've always been a believer that skill-level plays first fiddle, with size taking a secondary role. Has our writer ever had to make weight? I wonder.
In addition, this writer evokes the potentially late stage of Pacquiao's career as evidence to support his case. If anything, Pacquiao is doing a disfavor to his legacy by not fighting at 147, and not fighting for Cotto's welterweight title.
Comment
-
Originally posted by UncleSam View Postso basically writer is saying at 145 lbs cotto will not have a problem with weight at all and team pacman made a mistake agreeing to it..
THEN WHY THE F.UCK DO COTTO NUTHUGGERS KEEP BRING THE WEIGHT DRAIN ISSUE OF COTTO IN THIS FIGHT..
CAN YOU EXPLAIN COTTO NUTHUGGER?????????????
Comment
-
Originally posted by baya View Posthilarious - dude called cotto one dimensional in the article.
matteo - you need to slip in some tapes of cotto, you douche.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rob6465 View PostHonestly, he WAS 1 dimentional. Now he has a very, very good jab, better speed and more of a combo boxer/brawler. I hope Roach thinks Cotto is 1 dimentional on 11/14...lol
i've seen him since he was an amateur bruh - and he's always had a very good jab and excellent movement.
what he's improved on is his right hand.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by baya View Postget early tapes of him.
i've seen him since he was an amateur bruh - and he's always had a very good jab and excellent movement.
what he's improved on is his right hand.
Comment
Comment