"Cotto to be Pacquiao's Toughest Challenge since JMM" - Ring Mag

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ravishing
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 4798
    • 181
    • 47
    • 11,175

    #1

    "Cotto to be Pacquiao's Toughest Challenge since JMM" - Ring Mag

    Manny Pacquiao’s accomplishments mustn’t be diminished. In the past year, he has dismantled three world-class opponents in three weight divisions to earn comparisons to the great Henry Armstrong. He deserves the windfall of accolades he has received.

    At the same time, whether anyone likes it or not, we can look at those three opponents and find significant flaws.

    David Diaz is tough and well-schooled but not an elite fighter. Oscar De La Hoya, once one of the best, was a zombie the night he met Pacquiao because of weight loss and natural deterioration. And Ricky Hatton, when it came down to it, was good but overrated.

    This is one reason the announcement that Pacquiao will face Miguel Cotto on Nov. 14 is so exciting: You can’t find a comparable flaw in the Puerto Rican. He is relatively young (28), a gifted boxer, naturally bigger than Pacquiao and will be fighting only two pounds out of his natural weight class.

    Thus, this will be Pacquiao’s biggest challenge since he outpointed Juan Manuel Marquez in March of last year and might go further than any other fight in determining just how good the Filipino icon really is.

    Some have suggested that Cotto is in decline after the tremendous beating he took from Antonio Margarito in July of last year. They point to his narrow victory over rugged, but limited Joshua Clottey as evidence.

    I didn’t see it that way. I saw a tough guy fight gallantly through a gruesome cut –- when others might’ve quit –- and find a way to beat a very strong, proven veteran who was fit and determined to win. I thought it was an outstanding performance by Cotto.

    If he can find a way to beat Pacquiao, which is a distinct possibility, talk of his demise beforehand will seem foolish.

    Several knowledgeable observers have suggested that Cotto struggles only when his opponent backs him up, as Margarito did. And Pacquiao doesn’t fight like Margarito. Moving forward, Cotto can be a dominating fighter.

    And many still wonder what will happen when Pacquiao takes a big punch from a real welterweight, as Cotto is. The guess here is that his chin will be tested as never before.

    Bottom line: Cotto is big enough, experienced enough and good enough to beat the most-celebrated fighter in the world, a fact that Pacquaio’s many fans will find hard to swallow. It’s true, though; it can happen.

    But it won’t.

    In the end, I think Pacquiao will win the fight for one overriding reason: talent.

    Cotto was and remains an elite fighter. Anyone who beats Shane Mosley and compiles a record like his (34-1, 27 knockouts) is among the best at his craft. However, he’s no Pacquiao, whose natural gifts and refinement under trainer Freddie Roach are rare.

    Cotto is a very good boxer, Pacquaio a great boxer. And when very good meets great, great wins.

    Pacquiao might not be able to move Cotto backward as Margarito did but he presents many other problems. He might have the fastest hands in the world. He has learned to use his quick feet to get in (to do damage) and out (to avoid it) before his opponents can react. And he demonstrated in chilling fashion against Hatton that he can knock out a bigger man.

    The point of this is that it won’t be easy for Pacquiao, as the Diaz, De La Hoya and Hatton fights were. He’ll take punches from Cotto. He’ll find him difficult to hit at times. He’ll even lose rounds, which somehow seems unfathomable in light of his recent performances.

    Then, when he wins, it’ll mean that much more. He will have beaten a fighter who belongs on the pound-for-pound list and who was at his best at the time they fought. And afterward, no one will be able to say, “Yeah, Pacquaio won but …”

    Discover the latest boxing news, rankings, champions and exclusive editorial from The Ring, the sport’s most trusted magazine since 1922.
  • sikwatee
    Bulad Suka Sili
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 1000
    • 137
    • 88
    • 10,088

    #2
    Originally posted by Ravishing
    Then, when he wins, it’ll mean that much more. He will have beaten a fighter who belongs on the pound-for-pound list and who was at his best at the time they fought. And afterward, no one will be able to say, “Yeah, Pacquaio won but …”

    http://www.ringtv.com/blog/906/cotto...since_marquez/
    Well some can say, "Yeah, Pac won but they fought in a catchweight."

    Comment

    • Ravishing
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 4798
      • 181
      • 47
      • 11,175

      #3
      bump.........

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30593
        • 2,212
        • 938
        • 105,596

        #4
        That catch weight is nothing really. He beat Hatton at 140 and that is bigger than what Pac is naturally anyway.
        I just dont think Pac can get to 147 so it had to be a catch weight really

        Comment

        • Luis12
          Undisputed Champion
          • Mar 2009
          • 1191
          • 17
          • 6
          • 7,327

          #5
          saying that pac is better boxer than cotto is ******

          Comment

          • ericsantos
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 634
            • 14
            • 28
            • 7,067

            #6
            not that bad of an article but some questionable remarks

            Comment

            • rob6465
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2007
              • 1850
              • 36
              • 1
              • 8,362

              #7
              Originally posted by Ravishing
              Manny Pacquiao’s accomplishments mustn’t be diminished. In the past year, he has dismantled three world-class opponents in three weight divisions to earn comparisons to the great Henry Armstrong. He deserves the windfall of accolades he has received.

              At the same time, whether anyone likes it or not, we can look at those three opponents and find significant flaws.

              David Diaz is tough and well-schooled but not an elite fighter. Oscar De La Hoya, once one of the best, was a zombie the night he met Pacquiao because of weight loss and natural deterioration. And Ricky Hatton, when it came down to it, was good but overrated.

              This is one reason the announcement that Pacquiao will face Miguel Cotto on Nov. 14 is so exciting: You can’t find a comparable flaw in the Puerto Rican. He is relatively young (28), a gifted boxer, naturally bigger than Pacquiao and will be fighting only two pounds out of his natural weight class.

              Thus, this will be Pacquiao’s biggest challenge since he outpointed Juan Manuel Marquez in March of last year and might go further than any other fight in determining just how good the Filipino icon really is.

              Some have suggested that Cotto is in decline after the tremendous beating he took from Antonio Margarito in July of last year. They point to his narrow victory over rugged, but limited Joshua Clottey as evidence.

              I didn’t see it that way. I saw a tough guy fight gallantly through a gruesome cut –- when others might’ve quit –- and find a way to beat a very strong, proven veteran who was fit and determined to win. I thought it was an outstanding performance by Cotto.

              If he can find a way to beat Pacquiao, which is a distinct possibility, talk of his demise beforehand will seem foolish.

              Several knowledgeable observers have suggested that Cotto struggles only when his opponent backs him up, as Margarito did. And Pacquiao doesn’t fight like Margarito. Moving forward, Cotto can be a dominating fighter.

              And many still wonder what will happen when Pacquiao takes a big punch from a real welterweight, as Cotto is. The guess here is that his chin will be tested as never before.

              Bottom line: Cotto is big enough, experienced enough and good enough to beat the most-celebrated fighter in the world, a fact that Pacquaio’s many fans will find hard to swallow. It’s true, though; it can happen.

              But it won’t.

              In the end, I think Pacquiao will win the fight for one overriding reason: talent.

              Cotto was and remains an elite fighter. Anyone who beats Shane Mosley and compiles a record like his (34-1, 27 knockouts) is among the best at his craft. However, he’s no Pacquiao, whose natural gifts and refinement under trainer Freddie Roach are rare.

              Cotto is a very good boxer, Pacquaio a great boxer. And when very good meets great, great wins.

              Pacquiao might not be able to move Cotto backward as Margarito did but he presents many other problems. He might have the fastest hands in the world. He has learned to use his quick feet to get in (to do damage) and out (to avoid it) before his opponents can react. And he demonstrated in chilling fashion against Hatton that he can knock out a bigger man.

              The point of this is that it won’t be easy for Pacquiao, as the Diaz, De La Hoya and Hatton fights were. He’ll take punches from Cotto. He’ll find him difficult to hit at times. He’ll even lose rounds, which somehow seems unfathomable in light of his recent performances.

              Then, when he wins, it’ll mean that much more. He will have beaten a fighter who belongs on the pound-for-pound list and who was at his best at the time they fought. And afterward, no one will be able to say, “Yeah, Pacquaio won but …”

              http://www.ringtv.com/blog/906/cotto...since_marquez/
              I have SOOOOOOO much respect for cotto having a very nasty cut and sticking it out for 12 rds with a top 5 BIG welterweight. I have NO respect for margarito's record until he jumps back in the ring and fights a top 10 welterweight. I waited to see which cotto would show up in ring AFTER margarito beat down and I think a better cotto showed up. He does not look like the old cotto because he is fighting better fighters than early in his career.

              Comment

              • JM1
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 6655
                • 684
                • 529
                • 15,193

                #8
                before the de la hoya fight they said it will be his hardest. then ricky hatton, then cotto. the list goes on and on

                Comment

                • PRPOWERPUNCHES
                  Puerto Roca
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 2184
                  • 194
                  • 234
                  • 8,645

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Ravishing
                  Manny Pacquiao’s accomplishments mustn’t be diminished. In the past year, he has dismantled three world-class opponents in three weight divisions to earn comparisons to the great Henry Armstrong. He deserves the windfall of accolades he has received.

                  At the same time, whether anyone likes it or not, we can look at those three opponents and find significant flaws.

                  David Diaz is tough and well-schooled but not an elite fighter. Oscar De La Hoya, once one of the best, was a zombie the night he met Pacquiao because of weight loss and natural deterioration. And Ricky Hatton, when it came down to it, was good but overrated.

                  This is one reason the announcement that Pacquiao will face Miguel Cotto on Nov. 14 is so exciting: You can’t find a comparable flaw in the Puerto Rican. He is relatively young (28), a gifted boxer, naturally bigger than Pacquiao and will be fighting only two pounds out of his natural weight class.

                  Thus, this will be Pacquiao’s biggest challenge since he outpointed Juan Manuel Marquez in March of last year and might go further than any other fight in determining just how good the Filipino icon really is.

                  Some have suggested that Cotto is in decline after the tremendous beating he took from Antonio Margarito in July of last year. They point to his narrow victory over rugged, but limited Joshua Clottey as evidence.

                  I didn’t see it that way. I saw a tough guy fight gallantly through a gruesome cut –- when others might’ve quit –- and find a way to beat a very strong, proven veteran who was fit and determined to win. I thought it was an outstanding performance by Cotto.

                  If he can find a way to beat Pacquiao, which is a distinct possibility, talk of his demise beforehand will seem foolish.

                  Several knowledgeable observers have suggested that Cotto struggles only when his opponent backs him up, as Margarito did. And Pacquiao doesn’t fight like Margarito. Moving forward, Cotto can be a dominating fighter.

                  And many still wonder what will happen when Pacquiao takes a big punch from a real welterweight, as Cotto is. The guess here is that his chin will be tested as never before.

                  Bottom line: Cotto is big enough, experienced enough and good enough to beat the most-celebrated fighter in the world, a fact that Pacquaio’s many fans will find hard to swallow. It’s true, though; it can happen.

                  But it won’t.

                  In the end, I think Pacquiao will win the fight for one overriding reason: talent.

                  Cotto was and remains an elite fighter. Anyone who beats Shane Mosley and compiles a record like his (34-1, 27 knockouts) is among the best at his craft. However, he’s no Pacquiao, whose natural gifts and refinement under trainer Freddie Roach are rare.

                  Cotto is a very good boxer, Pacquaio a great boxer. And when very good meets great, great wins.

                  Pacquiao might not be able to move Cotto backward as Margarito did but he presents many other problems. He might have the fastest hands in the world. He has learned to use his quick feet to get in (to do damage) and out (to avoid it) before his opponents can react. And he demonstrated in chilling fashion against Hatton that he can knock out a bigger man.

                  The point of this is that it won’t be easy for Pacquiao, as the Diaz, De La Hoya and Hatton fights were. He’ll take punches from Cotto. He’ll find him difficult to hit at times. He’ll even lose rounds, which somehow seems unfathomable in light of his recent performances.

                  Then, when he wins, it’ll mean that much more. He will have beaten a fighter who belongs on the pound-for-pound list and who was at his best at the time they fought. And afterward, no one will be able to say, “Yeah, Pacquaio won but …”

                  http://www.ringtv.com/blog/906/cotto...since_marquez/
                  I agree 100% with that comment..

                  Comment

                  • Ray*
                    Be safe!!!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 44867
                    • 1,654
                    • 1,608
                    • 558,890

                    #10
                    Sorry but Pac win this fight without too much problems, you cant hit what you can see or get to and with the way cotto has been involve in too many wars against Judah,Mosley,Margarito and Clottey i think he needs more fights like jenning/gomez than a fight with Pacman..

                    I would be shocked, shocked if cotto wins this fight.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP