Quit comparing Eric Morales to Cotto.
Collapse
-
-
my blind support? you talk about checking your posts, but what about you checking mine. i was talking crap about juanma for acting like a scared ***** recently
the only guys i support for PR currently are cotto and calderon
of course they have nothing to do. morales had a lot more skill, and cotto has a lot more power. both can beat pac, and cotto may beat him by KOComment
-
This is a respectable post. See sir. I like it when guys like Boom, savor, and mellow speak like men with their heads on straight. I am also a very very big Juanma fan, but he deserves to be ****ted on for his recent behavior.my blind support? you talk about checking your posts, but what about you checking mine. i was talking crap about juanma for acting like a scared ***** recently
the only guys i support for PR currently are cotto and calderon
of course they have nothing to do. morales had a lot more skill, and cotto has a lot more power. both can beat pac, and cotto may beat him by KOComment
-
Part of the plan? Ok, Buboy, 'it was the plan', like you were drawing it up with Roach.that's becasue it was part of the plan for Pac turn up the heat in the mid rounds you idiot. when he did, it was all over.
Now explain to me why it wasn't a FLUKE.
EriC is not really that way ahead of Cotto, he is 2-1 against Barrera, and a Fluke win over unfocused, green, much smaller Pacman fighting with one eye and bleeding badly and coming up in wieght, who managed to damaged Morales with the padded Winning gloves which they trick Pacquiao to wear.
His win over Pac is a FLUKE
FLUKE = A lucky or improbable occurrence, with the implication that the occurrence could not be repeated.
It wasn't a fluke cuz Morales is a high caliber Hall of Fame fighter that switched stances and let Pac take free shots. If Pacquiao ever switched to orthodox against Morales in the first fight, he'd gotten knocked out.Comment
-
i hear ya
i have no problem with him being more interested in going to 126 for names, but ****, celestino has more belts than you; he's higher rated than you; he's calling you out... but you, a top PROSPECT, are speaking of money? gtfo outta here and admit you're a ***** or just say no, but don't use ****ing money as an excuse when you're not a draw yourself
the only pardon juanma has is to go up to 126 and clean that division. if he wants to talk about money, he better do something else than fighting local bumsComment
-
-
Congradulations, your award for 'Biggest Nuthugger of the Hour' will be coming your way shortly.EriC is really NOT that way ahead of Cotto, he is 2-1 against Barrera, ducked Marquez, Quit overrating EriC because of his Fluke win over unfocused, green, much smaller Pac fighting with one eye and bleeding badly and coming up in wieght, who managed to damaged Morales with the padded Winning gloves which they trick Pacquiao to wear.
His win over Pac is a FLUKE, don't get your panties in bunches.
FLUKE = A lucky or improbable occurrence, with the implication that the occurrence could not be repeated.Comment
-
Comment
-
ooohhh so it wasn't a FLUKE because Morales switched stance lmfao!! free shots my ass, Pac damaged Erik for good when he switched southpaw with the pilow winning gloves mind you.Part of the plan? Ok, Buboy, 'it was the plan', like you were drawing it up with Roach.
It wasn't a fluke cuz Morales is a high caliber Hall of Fame fighter that switched stances and let Pac take free shots. If Pacquiao ever switched to orthodox against Morales in the first fight, he'd gotten knocked out.
if you think that Pac turning up the heat in mid rounds wasn't part of the well executed winning game plan then you are an idiot.
i have the criteria of why it was a FLUKE.
Distractions with Murad
took morales lightly
bleeding badly because of headbutt
fighting with one eye
first time at 130
a bit green
tricked to wearing pillow winning gloves
etc. etc
yours
erik switched southpaw
FLUKE = A lucky or improbable occurrence, with the implication that the occurrence could not be repeated.Last edited by boojee; 07-28-2009, 10:22 AM.Comment


Comment