Does anyone else think Dawson V Johnson is a waste of time?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Heru
    Quintessence
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 9492
    • 533
    • 353
    • 26,205

    #21
    Put your round by round up. Dawson won the first fight and there's nothing that can sway me the other way. Even in the rounds he lost, he'd clearly win the first 2 minutes.

    If Dawson wasn't so reluctant to take the rematch, I'd say it wasn't necessary for a rematch, but the reluctance tells me Johnson's in Dawson's head. Even though he won, being in the trenches against Johnson might've been to rough for his liking.

    Comment

    • catalinul
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 6581
      • 115
      • 49
      • 13,580

      #22
      No it's a very good fight and necessary after the first one.

      Comment

      • TredKiller
        Not the Critic who Counts
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2009
        • 4538
        • 183
        • 180
        • 11,853

        #23
        i think Dawson/Johnson is the only fight at LHW that really matters, other then dawson pascal.

        Comment

        • illmaticfighter
          Viva Mexico!!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 2284
          • 76
          • 39
          • 8,839

          #24
          dawson won the first fight but johnson definitely deserves a rematch he took it too the younger fighter and if dawson wasn't so good he woulda been out of there.

          i think dawson did the right thing fighting tarver after johnson so i don't think a immediate rematch was neccessary.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP