I have something to say about Carl Froch

[The Gully Gad]

Yeah Froch could of lost, by like 1 or 2 points, but again not many fighters will be as good as what Taylor was. I think that was actually a good version of Taylor, he beat b-hop twice remember.

Im not sticking up for Taylor i aint a fan at all but he was worn out a little bruv by the time Froch got him..Those back to back Hop fights the Winky clash there was signs right after the Hop fights that he wasnt the same..

Not knocking froch though.Its that performance that got me to notice him
and its either him or kessler im tipping to win this tourney...

[Tmann400]

This is what i'm saying though he didn't "get lucky"

He knew Taylor would tire, he knew Taylor couldnt hold the pace and that if he was still there after round 8 he could win the fight. He even said so before the fight, over and over again.

Did Taylor learn? did he fight a smart fight and conserve his stamina? no he went all out like a moron and ended up like this.



And another thing, not every fighter can fight as well as Taylor did in those early rounds.

Jean Pascall the current Light Heavyweight champion is a much better fighter than Dirrell and Froch beat him, although froch was dumb and fought his fight.

you say it like its a fact. how do you KNOW pascal is a better fighter?

[Dynamite Kid]

TS has an egenda.

[NakiFan]

Because Pascall never got floored by a featherfist?

[T-97]

Why is, whenever someone praises Carl for his good points... people who just moan about his bad ones make out like they're making him out to be unbeatable....

Yes, we know Carl can be outboxed, we know a guy with fast hands, good boxing ability and a good chin could beat him...

Point is, unless your lightning fast, elusive, and hit hard for all 12 rounds and have the heart to keep going when the guy keeps coming at you... then there's also a chance you'll lose...

[catalinul]

Pascall fought a ****** fight with froch???

It was Froch who got drawn in you mupett, Froch was winning that fight easily when he used the jab.

And Taylor did go all out, hence why there was no oxygen in the arena past round 5.

Pascal fought a ****** fight.He went toe to toe with Froch from round 1 which was ******.

He did very good against Diaconu because he used his legs.Unlike with Froch.

Taylor didn't go all out.It's well known his stamina is weak and he doesn't have to go all out to get winded.He got tired plety of times before and does the same mistakes everytime.

[T-97]

you say it like its a fact. how do you KNOW pascal is a better fighter?

It's not a fact, but... as of now, Pascal has proved himself, where Dirrell has not. Dirrell is an unknown quality at this stage right now, he could be great, could get taken out in 1 round...

That's the beauty of this tourney, IMO

[NakiFan]

I agree, I think Froch is very beatable.

But hes not some bum that got lucky in 2 fights against Pascall and Taylor

[The Gully Gad]

I agree, I think Froch is very beatable.

But hes not some bum that got lucky in 2 fights against Pascall and Taylor

I agree with that as well G....

[Tmann400]

Because Pascall never got floored by a featherfist?

actually pascal still has a questionable chin. he was rocked by a guy i believes name was omar pittman who had a record of 15-3. froch wasnt able to hurt pascal. talent wise dirrell has way faster hands, puts combinations together better than pascal, and has showed to have a better chin thus far.