Pac wants to contest Cotto’s title/ Cotto insists that it should be a Non Title!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OnePunch
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 9090
    • 1,296
    • 757
    • 2,453,131

    #341
    Originally posted by mikelovesfood
    cosign. lets just all call this what this really is. as mak stated: a "superfight"

    i'm tired of this damn thread. someone give me K++

    ultimately i could careless if the belt was on the line. i just want to see the damn fight already.

    for the sole purpose of boosting boxing, catchweights are fine just as long as theres no title involved...

    cotto losing and still retaining belt will still look very weird though.
    bingo. case closed. lol

    Comment

    • baracuda
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 10779
      • 259
      • 569
      • 11,470

      #342
      Originally posted by OnePunch
      lots of things have been done in the past. Bad decisions, bad stoppages, Judah keeping the title after losing, etc. etc

      Come on man, you're smarter than that. How about we LEARN from past mistakes and make the effort to not repeat them?
      i should be the one saying that to you.........how is a catchweight a mistake now on pac vs cotto when it was'nt in the past......ive never heard of anyone complain on it til this fight.....

      Comment

      • OnePunch
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 9090
        • 1,296
        • 757
        • 2,453,131

        #343
        Originally posted by baracuda
        i should be the one saying that to you.........how is a catchweight a mistake now on pac vs cotto when it was'nt in the past......ive never heard of anyone complain on it til this fight.....
        Was this forum in existence in 1993? Where exactly would you have heard dissent?

        Comment

        • mikelovesfood
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 739
          • 38
          • 43
          • 6,898

          #344
          Originally posted by baracuda
          i should be the one saying that to you.........how is a catchweight a mistake now on pac vs cotto when it was'nt in the past......ive never heard of anyone complain on it til this fight.....
          cause you weren't here during that time. i remember i was here. there were several threads of ppl complaining. each thread had 300+ replies. it was crazy....

          Comment

          • baracuda
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 10779
            • 259
            • 569
            • 11,470

            #345
            Originally posted by OnePunch
            Was this forum in existence in 1993? Where exactly would you have heard dissent?
            your askin the wrong guy......im new here myself but not to boxing.......ive never seen or read in tv or newspapers,etc about complains on catchweights....

            Comment

            • baracuda
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 10779
              • 259
              • 569
              • 11,470

              #346
              Originally posted by mikelovesfood
              cause you weren't here during that time. i remember i was here. there were several threads of ppl complaining. each thread had 300+ replies. it was crazy....
              in which fight?.....and proof.....

              Comment

              • baracuda
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 10779
                • 259
                • 569
                • 11,470

                #347
                Originally posted by OnePunch
                Was this forum in existence in 1993? Where exactly would you have heard dissent?
                plus bhop vs dlh was a catchweight either and that was'nt long time ago....

                Comment

                • loui_ludwig
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 7669
                  • 184
                  • 2
                  • 19,376

                  #348
                  Isn't the IBF vacant, Arum should contact them too.

                  Comment

                  • BOOMbip
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 2275
                    • 132
                    • 51
                    • 8,735

                    #349
                    Originally posted by loui_ludwig
                    Isn't the IBF vacant, Arum should contact them too.

                    Cotto can't lose if it's for a Vacant Title....

                    Comment

                    • Chups
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2004
                      • 18400
                      • 1,835
                      • 1,281
                      • 52,879

                      #350
                      Originally posted by JACK D. RIPPER

                      The Packy team is powertrippin' right now.

                      And rightfully deserving so.....Pac is where the money is. Just ask Mosley and his proposed 140 fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP