Pacquiao vs Cotto is a title fight!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RisAri0
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2005
    • 3519
    • 77
    • 4
    • 16,154

    #41
    Originally posted by Mr._Pink
    why would i bet 30k on cotto?

    i have 8 mil. on pacquiao.

    i think you misunderstood.
    u know what... I think I did then lol... u made me think u was betting on cotto though http://boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281234

    Comment

    • WhoreUs
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 15770
      • 556
      • 606
      • 20,363

      #42
      Originally posted by RisAri0
      yeah ok..but whatever man...I know i'm not lying tho' cuz y the hell then would I sig it.. but fucc it I'll take it off then..
      look i'll give you 30k if you want but i didn't bet on cotto.

      i'm a pac nuthugger and i predict pac to win by tko.

      like i said.....i wouldn't bet 30k on cotto if i bet 8m on pacquiao.

      Comment

      • JM1
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2009
        • 6655
        • 684
        • 529
        • 15,193

        #43
        Originally posted by BAD-BOY
        You got raciest from that....LOL R-E-T-A-R-D
        if someone from boxingscene told us to speak our language, we should brand them as a racist.

        Comment

        • JAB5239
          Dallas Cowboys
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 27722
          • 5,036
          • 4,436
          • 73,018

          #44
          Originally posted by JM1
          well, i hope that its a title fight for boxing history's sake.
          Originally posted by JM1
          lets wait for the details cause most articles say that it will be a title fight

          I love Pac and think it would be a great accomplishment, but one title out of four recognized titles is not historic. I think Cotto is the best fighter at 147, but he isn't the man. That distinction belongs to Mosely. all these weight classes are impressive, but its more impressive to establish longevity and dominance over the top guys in each division than it is to just grab a paper title.

          Comment

          • whirlwind
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2005
            • 1651
            • 57
            • 1
            • 8,017

            #45
            Originally posted by JAB5239
            [B]

            I love Pac and think it would be a great accomplishment, but one title out of four recognized titles is not historic. I think Cotto is the best fighter at 147, but he isn't the man. That distinction belongs to Mosely. all these weight classes are impressive, but its more impressive to establish longevity and dominance over the top guys in each division than it is to just grab a paper title.
            History! History is more important than dominating a division. It will never put you there and people will easily forget you. Pac 7th world title division will go down in history as one of the greatest boxers of all time.

            Comment

            • JAB5239
              Dallas Cowboys
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 27722
              • 5,036
              • 4,436
              • 73,018

              #46
              Originally posted by whirlwind
              History! History is more important than dominating a division. It will never put you there and people will easily forget you. Pac 7th world title division will go down in history as one of the greatest boxers of all time.
              What is historical about winning 1 out of 4 titles compared to establishing yourself as the best? Sonny Liston had ONE successful title defense and is looked at by most as one of the ten or twelve best heavyweights in history. Why? Because he cleaned out and dominated that division on his way to the title.

              To many of you clowns put to much stock into these paper titles. Its good to see Manny winning titles, but if you don't defend against the best or unify, it means little compared with the names Armstrong, Langford or Charles. There is much more substance in dominating a division than just winning a title.

              Comment

              • andrew14
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Oct 2005
                • 581
                • 101
                • 105
                • 7,755

                #47
                TITLE fight a catch up one

                It is a title fight its upto cotto to decide if he want it to defend against Pacman.

                It is a welter weight fight. pac never enter 147lb in a fight he weight 142 in

                weigh-in and enters 148 in the ring. but ODLH and pac fight it over 147.

                the weight limit for wbo doesnt matter as long as cotto decides it.

                Comment

                • gopi11
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 3731
                  • 174
                  • 210
                  • 10,160

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Marijuana
                  Of course it shouldn't be for the title. Since when can you not weigh 146 or 147 for a WW title fight? WW is 147. I'm sure the boxing dip****s will make it a title fight so there boy Pacquiao get more undeserved recognition.


                  A welterweight fight is somewhere between 141 to 147, and 147 being its max weight. There was already a precedent back in the days, but for an easy recall, check out the Hopkins/De La Hoya fight, the catch weight was 158, and that's for Hopkins' middleweight belts.

                  So your excuse that it shouldn't be for the title because the fight will get made at 145, won't fly, because you're dead wrong...

                  Comment

                  • riannu
                    Up and Comer
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 72
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    • 6,116

                    #49
                    I have mixed feelings about catchweight for a title fiht, but i guess some of you need some lessons in history.

                    Hopkin-DLH for unified SMW @ 158 lbs.
                    Leonard-Lalonde WBC LHW @ 168 lbs.
                    Leonard-Hearns 2 WBO SMW @ 163 lbs.
                    Norris-Taylor WBC LMW @ 150 lbs.
                    Whitaker-Chavez WBC WW @ 145 lbs.

                    Funny the last one will parrallel the Cotta-Pac fight. Cotto will come in at 145 while Pac at 142 just like Whitaker and Chavez did.

                    Comment

                    • riannu
                      Up and Comer
                      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 72
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      • 6,116

                      #50
                      I have mixed feelings about catchweight for a title fiht, but i guess some of you need some lessons in history.

                      Hopkin-DLH for unified MW @ 158 lbs.
                      Leonard-Lalonde WBC LHW @ 168 lbs.
                      Leonard-Hearns 2 WBO SMW @ 163 lbs.
                      Norris-Taylor WBC LMW @ 150 lbs.
                      Whitaker-Chavez WBC WW @ 145 lbs.

                      Funny the last one will parrallel the Cotta-Pac fight. Cotto will come in at 145 while Pac at 142 just like Whitaker and Chavez did.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP