Room For a New Face: New Pound For Pound List

[VERDUGO]

Mayweather retired and didn't do **** in 2 years.
He shouldn't be in there...even if he beats the lightweight.

[oc9979]

Vasquez is out because he's inactive and has no fight signed (as noted in the previously updated list). Marquez dropped out because Hasegawa deserved the ten spot more based on results than rep. Mayweather is back in because he's fighting in little more than a month and wasn't gone long enough to assume he's slipped THAT much.

Just my take...and Ring has nothing to do with it per an earlier poster. Ring don't pay me 1 cent.

come on Floyd retired and come back and you put him at 3. moving hopkins. you have to be joking. that you just make it to the list just for being unretired now. you could put him in the list after the fight but not before. your list is garbage

[Burner]

Where the **** was Floyd when he retired...NUMBER 1.

You think he turned into Baldimir over night.

****in dumbasses.

[BattlingNelson]

Where the **** was Floyd when he retired...NUMBER 1.

You think he turned into Baldimir over night.

****in dumbasses.

You're not to be taken serious anyway. You belive that Floyd should be no.1 when he has beaten the p4p no.2 regardless of the gigantic weightleap the 35 old JMM has taken this past year.

[Iceta]

The fact that this list has Calderon and Mayweather in it makes it have no credibility. I really don't even think Dawson should be in it since he hasn't shown that he is superior over Glen Johnson yet. If he beats him impressively in the second fight (which I don't think he will, unlike a lot of people) then his spot will be justified.

[crold1]

It's time to get Wlad in the list, Cliff. You put some relatively unaccomplished midget in the list at #10, but ignore a guy who has beaten all comers in his division for four years.

1) I don't rate heavies P4P.

2) Even if I did, it is, by far, the worst division in the whole sport.

3) If all fighters were the same size, the underlying meaning of P4P, Wlad would not be among the top 30 much less 10.

[crold1]

come on Floyd retired and come back and you put him at 3. moving hopkins. you have to be joking. that you just make it to the list just for being unretired now. you could put him in the list after the fight but not before. your list is garbage

So basically you're saying we all realize he's that good but he has to earn it...but these aren't divisional ratings. Why delay the inevitable?

[BattlingNelson]

1) I don't rate heavies P4P.

2) Even if I did, it is, by far, the worst division in the whole sport.

3) If all fighters were the same size, the underlying meaning of P4P, Wlad would not be among the top 30 much less 10.

Why don't you rate heavies Cliff? Ring magazine does:

http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph...r_Pound--1980s

[BattlingNelson]

So basically you're saying we all realize he's that good but he has to earn it...but these aren't divisional ratings. Why delay the inevitable?

Because signing for a fight against a 35 year old blown up super feather weight at welterweight doesn't warrent a top 3 rating.

[crold1]

Because signing for a fight against a 35 year old blown up super feather weight at welterweight doesn't warrent a top 3 rating.

I moved him back to that spot in May...this wasn't new and for sake of debate if nothing else I think he belongs there.

And I don't care what Ring does.