I agree. The only person I would give possible consideration to is Williams because he's shown flexability in the weight classes. Still, I don't think even Williams has fought the same level of competition Cotto has.
Also: I know I am probably alone in this statement, but beating the #5 should not mean you are not as good as the #5. Even if Cotto v. Mosley "could have gone either way" shouldn't that mean they are just about equally as skilled?
Also: I know I am probably alone in this statement, but beating the #5 should not mean you are not as good as the #5. Even if Cotto v. Mosley "could have gone either way" shouldn't that mean they are just about equally as skilled?
What are you smoking? Floyd is in it and Cotto is too low, how is that decent? They take two great fighters out for inactivity due to medical problems(Vazquez) or just recovery time(Marquez) but put one in with more time out and because of a voluntary, well placed and pretty convenient retirement. The list sucks! All they did is place Mayweather so high that when he beats Marquez(hope not) he'll be #2 and if Cotto beats Paquiao that'll make him #1 once more. What a bunch of nuthuggers are The Ring people.
Comment