Amir Khan needs to rematch Prescott

[BetterCallSaul]

Bet you it'll either be a junior, light, or super title. And he'll sit on it per Warren's instructions, just like the nonlinear **** that he is.

Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t, Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,
Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t, Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,
Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t, Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,
Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t, Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,
Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t, Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,
Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t, Cu*t,Cu*t,Cu*t,

Do you know what you are? Your a twat!!!

[Kalion]

How about taking a look at your own post and seeing what ******ity really is. You obviously don't realise it, but your posts on this matter are genuine facepalm stuff. Take a good long look and reflect on things.



Alright, I'm going to TRY and put this straight to you in clear English so that you can maybe understand. MAYBE. I know it's a really big ask, because of your level of intelligence, but let's see if you can manage it. Try, at least. You'll feel better for it. OK? Let's go...

Manny Pacquiao got KTFO in 1995 by a bum. It happened again 4 years later at the hands of another bum. Following that, it took him four years to reinvent himself to get to a level high enough to beat a certain Marco Antonio Barrera. That happened in 2003. Now, let's go over that timespan again - FOUR YEARS. See we did there? He was a young boy and had plenty of time to build up a great career, and so he has.

Amir Khan got KTFO in 2008 by a nobody. He is 22 years old. His career is still in its infancy. Since the loss, it has taken him only 10 months to step straight into the world title scene with a win over a durable champion (paper title or not, it doesn't matter). At the moment that doesn't say he can beat everybody on the planet, but it says something.

Where does he go from now? Well surprise surprise, he moves forward with his career. Where does Prescott go? Who knows... and right now, it seems as though not a lot of people care. Did people care about Sangsurat and Torrecampo, then and now? Thought not. Pac was the one destined for stardom, whilst those 2 were just negative stopgaps. No need to even think about them. Ancient history.

Now, let's reflect on Khan's timespan - again, he's 22 years old and his pro career only began 4 years ago. By rights he should still have 15 years or more to build up further wins (hopefully against good opposition, but blame Warren if that doesn't happen right away), maybe even take another loss along the way, but the key is that he has a LONG TIME to do things. In 9 years' time, it could be that nobody will give a **** about Prescott - and Khan could be a world champ in 2 divisions.

You seem to be incredibly narky and bitter about this "He needs to impress, he needs to impress, he needs to impress, he needs to impress, he needs to impress, he needs to impress" bull****, but you're either too ****** to realise this or you're dodging the issue on purpose - he has a LONG WAY TO GO. Just like Pac did.

That's our lesson over for today. Take some notes, do your homework, be a good boy and keep educating your small brain. You might JUST get through life somehow if you open your mind to a broader picture. :smile1:

Youre pretty funny. You type a wall of text/bull**** and think you "educated" me or some lame **** like that.

This is the fact: The thing Khan is most known for SO FAR in his career is getting KTFO in 30 seconds to a boxing nobody. Nothing he has done since then trumps that. If you think otherwise then your just adding to the evidence that ur mentally disabled.

The fact that prescott has done nothing but lose since then only makes Khans loss to him look WORSE!

Good joob with the pac comparison, its a great example of what khan could do. But it seems as if the consensus is that the next time Khan faces anyone with punching power or a world class fighter, hell KTFO again. Just cheack any of the threads that are posted about Khan vs ____.

[PittyPat]

Good joob with the pac comparison, its a great example of what khan could do. But it seems as if the consensus is that the next time Khan faces anyone with punching power or a world class fighter, hell KTFO again. Just cheack any of the threads that are posted about Khan vs ____.

Riiiiight... a "consensus", on a boxing forum with people typing on keyboards behind their monitors? Yup, definitely something to go by(!) It's gospel, y'know? One thing those threads have in common - they're majorly repetitive. Kinda like what comes out of Mayweather's mouth each time.

I find it laughable that people have this burning desire, in the midst of their own lives, to label a young lad's boxing career as doomed to fail on the back of one loss, when he's barely even got going with said career. Good thing Pac didn't read any internet boxing forums 10 years ago, or he might've been doomed from the hate(!) :eyeroll:

With any luck, under Roach's guidance (for however long he can still stay in the game), Khan can look up to Pac's career and do his best to emulate that path. At this point, he's doing all the right things - had Prescott not knocked some sense into his chinny head, he'd still be fighting like he used to. He'll be fine.

The fact that prescott has done nothing but lose since then only makes Khans loss to him look WORSE!

With your logic, both Sangsurat and Torrecampo being KO'ed in their 2nd fights following the wins over Pac makes him look even WORSE!!! Holy ****. Pac must be a total bum.

[Kalion]

Riiiiight... a "consensus", on a boxing forum with people typing on keyboards behind their monitors? Yup, definitely something to go by(!) It's gospel, y'know? One thing those threads have in common - they're majorly repetitive. Kinda like what comes out of Mayweather's mouth each time.

I find it laughable that people have this burning desire, in the midst of their own lives, to label a young lad's boxing career as doomed to fail on the back of one loss, when he's barely even got going with said career. Good thing Pac didn't read any internet boxing forums 10 years ago, or he might've been doomed from the hate(!) :eyeroll:

With any luck, under Roach's guidance (for however long he can still stay in the game), Khan can look up to Pac's career and do his best to emulate that path. At this point, he's doing all the right things - had Prescott not knocked some sense into his chinny head, he'd still be fighting like he used to. He'll be fine.



With your logic, both Sangsurat and Torrecampo being KO'ed in their 2nd fights following the wins over Pac makes him look even WORSE!!! Holy ****. Pac must be a total bum.

Well a website built for boxing fans to share news and opinions may not be the best place to gauge the consensus on Khans career but isnt the worse, its not your local barber shop or some **** some of you guys are really bright.. I dont wish that Khan has a unsucessful career, I dont wish that on anyone. I just dont like hype jobs like a lot of other people. He hasnt proven his KO loss was a fluke and in my eyes in many others some of whom are fans of his, that he is not worthy of a lot of the praise he recieves.People try to act like it never happened. Neither one of us knows what his future holds but we know whats in his past. The thing that stands out most so far in is his career is getting KTFO in 30 seconds, cant argue that. So maybe you just need to take few deep breahts and calm down.

And at the time of pacs 2 losses im sure some people called him a bum, but he has since then proven him wrong. Just like right now people are calling Khan a hype job, glassed chinned, bum etc... But he has yet to prove them wrong.

We just gotta sit back and see, but if he does fail evryone will point to the prescott fight and say "I told ya so".

[The_Visitation]

Youre pretty funny. You type a wall of text/bull**** and think you "educated" me or some lame **** like that.

Nah.. he just has a clue. You haven't.

This is the fact: The thing Khan is most known for SO FAR in his career is getting KTFO in 30 seconds to a boxing nobody. Nothing he has done since then trumps that.

That is no longer true. If the Barrera fight hadn't ended in such unfortunate circumstances it would have have ceased being true then.

The fact that prescott has done nothing but lose since then only makes Khans loss to him look WORSE!

He actually won the fight he took between Khan and Vasquez, albeit it by disqualification (I have no idea what the cards said at the point). Actually it doesn't matter that Prescott was a 'boxing nobody', even if that had been true. He landed a good punch which would actually have KO'd rather more than just the 'glass chinned' .. and the reason he landed it was that Khan's defence was totally ****e, he left himself open and walked into it. Since then... Roach. Khan is a different fighter.

But it seems as if the consensus is that the next time Khan faces anyone with punching power or a world class fighter, hell KTFO again.

'Consensus' among who? Those who were telling us the only way Kotelnik could lose was because of dodgy or corrupt judges? Khan is never going to have an iron chin, we all know that, but then despite Prescott Khan has taken some pretty good ones and gone on to win both before and after that fight. The key is defence.. anyone can get KO'd, but the fewer that hit you solid the less likely that is to happen.

Prescott just isn't a factor any more.

[Roger Mellie]

Well a website built for boxing fans to share news and opinions may not be the best place to gauge the consensus on Khans career but isnt the worse, its not your local barber shop or some **** some of you guys are really bright.. I dont wish that Khan has a unsucessful career, I dont wish that on anyone. I just dont like hype jobs like a lot of other people. He hasnt proven his KO loss was a fluke and in my eyes in many others some of whom are fans of his, that he is not worthy of a lot of the praise he recieves.People try to act like it never happened. Neither one of us knows what his future holds but we know whats in his past. The thing that stands out most so far in is his career is getting KTFO in 30 seconds, cant argue that. So maybe you just need to take few deep breahts and calm down.

And at the time of pacs 2 losses im sure some people called him a bum, but he has since then proven him wrong. Just like right now people are calling Khan a hype job, glassed chinned, bum etc... But he has yet to prove them wrong.

We just gotta sit back and see, but if he does fail evryone will point to the prescott fight and say "I told ya so".

Who in the good f.uck ever considered you to be a real boxing fan?

[Kalion]

Who in the good f.uck ever considered you to be a real boxing fan?

...who considered you?

[ophqui]

they'll question the loss anyway. i say forget about it. No one remembers the fact that lennox beat mccall and rahman, they remember the fact that he got sparko'd by both of them. For khan to rematch him now would be a little pointless i feel, and if he lost to him again it'd be curtains. He's got big money matches with witter or hatton on the horizon, why on earth would he rematch prescott? he'd prove a lot more by beating witter

[Roger Mellie]

...who considered you?

Me. I take an interest and have been involved with it nearly 30 years. Stick to the wrestling son!

[PittyPat]

I just dont like hype jobs like a lot of other people.

Sure, nobody does. I can't stand Valero because people hype him up to be something incredible, when all he did until Pitalua was fight a bunch of nobodies and gain notoriety for himself because of the KO record - not to mention being an insanely **** boxer along the way (stylistically the worst right now IMO). Somehow, though, he's the WBC champ at 135, having beaten a durable Pitalua. Something sounds very familiar here...

As for hype on Khan's part, he goes to the ring and uses his hands to earn his living - whilst his promoters (Warren and co) do the hyping mostly on his behalf. If Khan himself happens to say something to piss people off (i.e. "I'm the best p4p fighter on the planet"), one really should take a step back and think about who's encouraging him say that, or more importantly who's giving him the confidence to do so. I don't think it's a bad thing at all, since clearly people are buying tickets in droves and ordering the PPVs. Plus, it brings Britain back into the world title picture, which is good in all sorts of ways.

The thing that stands out most so far in is his career is getting KTFO in 30 seconds

So 10 months after Torrecampo and Sangsurant, everyone would've been left solely with the image of a young and exciting Pac writhing around in pain on the canvas, after being KO'ed in 3 rounds both times? Somehow I doubt that. I really do.

And at the time of pacs 2 losses im sure some people called him a bum, but he has since then proven him wrong. Just like right now people are calling Khan a hype job, glassed chinned, bum etc... But he has yet to prove them wrong.

See that's where it just sounds ridiculous and reeks of double standards. Sure, Khan has to prove that he can take punishment as the opposition gets tougher, but so did Pac. It took him upwards of 4 years to do so. Khan's only been champ for 24 hours! Must he drop the title now simply because he hasn't proven people wrong in 10 months, and 24 hours later? :laff2: What a ****ty fighter Pac must be, for not proving people wrong until 4 years later his career(!)

We just gotta sit back and see, but if he does fail evryone will point to the prescott fight and say "I told ya so".

That goes without saying, and it's pretty much stating the obvious. Perhaps they should invent crystal balls so that we can all see into the future and consider his career doomed on another loss, whilst ignoring any potential exciting fights he'll have along the way. Sadly, I bet a lot of 'fans' would take that easy option given the choice.

Actually, it's a shame people didn't have crystal balls during Pac's loss to Torrecampo - they would've seen another KO at the hands of Sangsurant, and even a UD against Morales! Oh dear. Definitely not a career worth watching, right?