I wouldn't mind seeing the old men scrap for a second time. They can both not do enough to clearly win the fight and then complain about the verdict. It will make for great controversy.
Hopkins-Glenn Johnson rematch
Collapse
-
No real need for Hopkins to go that route unless he absolutely can't get anything bigger. He already beat the living **** out of Johnson 10 years ago.
But he is considering facing the Dawson/Johnson II winner.
But we all know that Johnson won't be winning that one.Comment
-
Although I pretty much agree, I'm no way going to count out Johnson. I think he will come in extremely prepared for this fight, everything is on the line and he wants revenge. I think Chad will start out the fight much like the last one, boxing and putting rounds in the bank. However I think chad might get caught up with the idea that he NEEDS to look impressive against Johnson, to shut up his critics and those that said Johnson won the first fight, doing so will get him trading shots with Glen, which could spell trouble for Chad.
In other words, if Chad fights smart, he should win no problem. If he doesn't, Johnson has a real shot at winning.Comment
-
I see it being either a carbon copy of the first fight, or Dawson fighting smarter and easily winning on points.Although I pretty much agree, I'm no way going to count out Johnson. I think he will come in extremely prepared for this fight, everything is on the line and he wants revenge. I think Chad will start out the fight much like the last one, boxing and putting rounds in the bank. However I think chad might get caught up with the idea that he NEEDS to look impressive against Johnson, to shut up his critics and those that said Johnson won the first fight, doing so will get him trading shots with Glen, which could spell trouble for Chad.
In other words, if Chad fights smart, he should win no problem. If he doesn't, Johnson has a real shot at winning.
Either way ; I see a Dawson win.
Which hopefully leads to one final execution when Hopkins schools his ass like I know he can.Comment
-
Wrong. Dawson has a great chance of beating Hopkins. I would favor him
Hopkins does best against plodding fighters who aren't as active (Tito, Pavlik, Tarver) but struggles to win rounds against active fighters who throw a lot of punches (Taylor, Calzaghe). Dawson is not plodding and he throws a lot of combinations. Hopkins would more than likely lose a close UD and complain about the result.Comment
Comment