Is pac really "proven" at 140/147

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WhoreUs
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 15770
    • 556
    • 606
    • 20,363

    #31
    Originally posted by Walt Liquor
    Thanks pinky, but you forgot that Delahoya had a run in his stocking for that fight.

    Good one Sucka.
    don't forget delahoya threw that fight.

    Comment

    • madsweeney
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 4551
      • 508
      • 298
      • 14,237

      #32
      Originally posted by SuckaPunch
      He said pie chart, your data doesn't count.

      Here's the Pacquiao victories pie chart:



      Yellow = weight-drained bums
      Purple = had sex the night before (weak when they fought Pac)
      LOL

      Sorry about not getting the sarcasm, I thought you were at first then I saw you follow it up with more of the same stuff...sadly, sarcasm doesn't bode well on forums

      I love how dejavous was damn near jumping out of his seat agreeing with you tho

      Comment

      • WhoreUs
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 15770
        • 556
        • 606
        • 20,363

        #33
        Originally posted by SuckaPunch
        He said pie chart, your data doesn't count.

        Here's the Pacquiao victories pie chart:



        Yellow = weight-drained bums
        Purple = had sex the night before (weak when they fought Pac)
        hahaha

        it's so bad the cotto stans are already using the weight drained and past prime excuse and pac hasn't even won yet! lol

        Comment

        • rob6465
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 1850
          • 36
          • 1
          • 8,362

          #34
          Originally posted by madsweeney
          I was reading a comparison thread of jmm/pbf catchweight vs cotto/pac and it got me thinking. One of the biggest issues people have with jmm/pbf is that jmm is new to the weight and he's unproven to be successful at that weight.

          Given that so many people don't give Pac credit for his fights at 140 and 147, how can they say he's proven at those weights? Its kinda silly to say Pac's a LWW at the same time his one fight at that weight was a "fluke" where Hatton could have been knocked out by anybody.

          So which is it, did he prove himself above 140 against hatton and DLH or were the flukes and he should still be considered a 135 pounder?
          Hatton? Oscar? PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ! My 10 yr old neice would've embarrasssed the oscar that fought pacman. Hatton? Cannot waste my comment on him.

          Comment

          • rob6465
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 1850
            • 36
            • 1
            • 8,362

            #35
            Originally posted by Mr._Pink
            hahaha

            it's so bad the cotto stans are already using the weight drained and past prime excuse and pac hasn't even won yet! lol
            Cotto fans might be making excuses....cotto does not make excuses. Fans...are idiots.

            Comment

            • Walt Liquor
              the opposite of pure
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 21667
              • 913
              • 1,369
              • 40,313

              #36
              Originally posted by madsweeney
              LOL

              I love how dejavous was damn near jumping out of his seat agreeing with you tho
              soooooooo funny.

              Comment

              • rob6465
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 1850
                • 36
                • 1
                • 8,362

                #37
                Pink? See that's what you cannot see. The 2 fighters are not making excuses, it's the idiot fans for both fighters that are making excuses. Cotto is okay with 65-35 or 70-30 split, he is okay with 145-147, just does not want to fight at lower than 145 and pacman does not want to fight at 146-147.

                Comment

                • WhoreUs
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 15770
                  • 556
                  • 606
                  • 20,363

                  #38
                  Originally posted by rob6465
                  Pink? See that's what you cannot see. The 2 fighters are not making excuses, it's the idiot fans for both fighters that are making excuses. Cotto is okay with 65-35 or 70-30 split, he is okay with 145-147, just does not want to fight at lower than 145 and pacman does not want to fight at 146-147.
                  i never said the fighters are making excuses.

                  of course it's the fans.

                  Comment

                  • bojangles1987
                    bo jungle
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 41118
                    • 1,326
                    • 357
                    • 63,028

                    #39
                    He completely obliterated the reigning no question 140 pound champ, so I think he is proven at 140. It's easy in hindsight to make excuses and act like everyone knew Hatton was shot, but no one thought Hatton would get wiped out like that, and no one was claiming anyone else at 140 was the real champ.

                    As for his whole career, how is he not proven? He knocked out Barrera when he was the no question top fighter at featherweight and was only a year removed from beating Morales. He pretty much destroyed everyone he has fought since then with the exception of one fight to Morales and 2 fights with Marquez, in which he has a draw and a win.

                    He's not proven at 147, but he hasn't fought there so no one is claiming he is.

                    Comment

                    • Pullcounter
                      no guts no glory
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 42582
                      • 549
                      • 191
                      • 49,739

                      #40
                      Originally posted by madsweeney
                      I was reading a comparison thread of jmm/pbf catchweight vs cotto/pac and it got me thinking. One of the biggest issues people have with jmm/pbf is that jmm is new to the weight and he's unproven to be successful at that weight.

                      Given that so many people don't give Pac credit for his fights at 140 and 147, how can they say he's proven at those weights? Its kinda silly to say Pac's a LWW at the same time his one fight at that weight was a "fluke" where Hatton could have been knocked out by anybody.

                      So which is it, did he prove himself above 140 against hatton and DLH or were the flukes and he should still be considered a 135 pounder?
                      he is proven at 140, but not proven at 147.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP