Mikkel Kessler Can Still Become #1 SMW Ever

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest
    • 0
    • 0
    • 0

    #31
    A lot of times in that fight Calzaghe because of his unorthodox style made Kessler stop punching.

    Kessler seems to need a sort of rhythmn because he wants to be accurate, but you just have to keep throwing and throwing the jab against Joe even though you will be missing a lot.

    Kessler wanted to be a little too precise in that fight. He could've stolen another round or two had he done that.

    Comment

    • egreezy
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 3602
      • 250
      • 498
      • 10,101

      #32
      Originally posted by S a m u r a i
      I think you need to watch that fight again. First, remove any bias, though.
      You can't remove bias of clean effective punching; that's how Lederman tells me to score. I think Kessler also started figuring out and neutralizing Calzaghe's toward the end of the fight and if it went 15 would surely had the win. Did you make a scorecard for this fight I would like to see which rounds you had close, clear or wide.

      Comment

      • S.G.
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 9412
        • 296
        • 635
        • 16,360

        #33
        The problem is, I'd find it hard to rank Kessler above Calzaghe ever when he was actually beaten in a head-to-head, in his prime

        Thus how can he possibly be better

        I mean, aside from an actual head-to-head bout it's all speculation

        Comment

        • BattlingNelson
          Mod a Phukka
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 29881
          • 3,255
          • 3,198
          • 286,536

          #34
          Originally posted by S.G.
          The problem is, I'd find it hard to rank Kessler above Calzaghe ever when he was actually beaten in a head-to-head, in his prime

          Thus how can he possibly be better

          I mean, aside from an actual head-to-head bout it's all speculation
          So Brewster will always be better than Wlad????

          Comment

          • boxasmash
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 7039
            • 222
            • 63
            • 14,591

            #35
            a 35 year old calzaghe beat a prime 28 year old kessler decisively. kessler can win as many times as he wants, he will never be better than joe now.

            Comment

            • boxasmash
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 7039
              • 222
              • 63
              • 14,591

              #36
              kessler did not have a broken hand, that's ******ed. his hand may or may not have been injured but it definitely wasn't broken.

              Comment

              • S.G.
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 9412
                • 296
                • 635
                • 16,360

                #37
                Originally posted by BattlingNelson
                So Brewster will always be better than Wlad????
                Okay, within reason. Calzaghe is someone who is already pretty much universally recognised as the greatest super middleweight. Even if Kessler does win this tournament, he's still hardly going to be leaps and bounds ahead of Calzaghe resume-wise, if even ahead at all, thus the head-to-head aspect becomes more important... And Calzaghe did beat Kessler handily

                Comment

                • BattlingNelson
                  Mod a Phukka
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 29881
                  • 3,255
                  • 3,198
                  • 286,536

                  #38
                  Originally posted by boxasmash
                  kessler did not have a broken hand, that's ******ed. his hand may or may not have been injured but it definitely wasn't broken.
                  It was surgically repaired afterwards.

                  Comment

                  • BattlingNelson
                    Mod a Phukka
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 29881
                    • 3,255
                    • 3,198
                    • 286,536

                    #39
                    Originally posted by S.G.
                    Okay, within reason. Calzaghe is someone who is already pretty much universally recognised as the greatest super middleweight. Even if Kessler does win this tournament, he's still hardly going to be leaps and bounds ahead of Calzaghe resume-wise, if even ahead at all, thus the head-to-head aspect becomes more important... And Calzaghe did beat Kessler handily
                    Fair enough.

                    Comment

                    • Pugilistic™
                      MV3
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 9848
                      • 324
                      • 305
                      • 16,773

                      #40
                      What it his right hand that was supposedly broken ?

                      For a broken hand he was able to uses it alot early on.





                      I personally think Kessler's hand wasn't hurt and that it was just a rumor.

                      The rumor only became a "fact" after Calzaghe decisively beat him.

                      Besides all that, it was a very good tactical fight that i enjoyed alot.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP