Would pacman be the number 1 WW if he beats cotto??
Collapse
-
-
-
In order to be the man at WW you need to ACTUALLY beat THE MAN at 147...not the guy who beat him in the past.
Pac would need to beat Mosley...because SSM is the numbe one ranked WW.Comment
-
-
IMO, anything is possible for pacman. however, he cannot be considered the best welterweight if the fight with cotto is not at welterweight. he would have to fight cotto at 147, and clearly beat him to overtake mosley as the best current wlterweight. this catchweight **** is wrong IMO, it should be at 147 or 140. simplesssssssss.Comment
-
Well, Manny just KO Hatton at 140 and he's considered the number 1 guy there..Comment
-
If the fight is at 147 yes you would have to say Manny is the number 1 WW. Miguel is the top dog at 147, he beat Mosley. Yeah, yeah, yeah Mosley beat Margarito but since the Cotto V Margarito fight is clouded you have to disregard it and since Miguel beat Shane that means Miguel is top dog. Till Mosley beats Miguel he is still number 2. You don't pass the guy that beat you by just beating the guy that beat him. Cotto>Mosley, Mosley>Margarito, doesn't equal Mosley>Cotto. Head to head matchups.Comment
-
If the fight is at 147 yes you would have to say Manny is the number 1 WW. Miguel is the top dog at 147, he beat Mosley. Yeah, yeah, yeah Mosley beat Margarito but since the Cotto V Margarito fight is clouded you have to disregard it and since Miguel beat Shane that means Miguel is top dog. Till Mosley beats Miguel he is still number 2. You don't pass the guy that beat you by just beating the guy that beat him. Cotto>Mosley, Mosley>Margarito, doesn't equal Mosley>Cotto. Head to head matchups.
your a cotto fan right? therefore slghtly biased. im neutral on this and cotto is not the number 1 welterweight. cotto wasnt even top ten p4p after the loss to margarito, there is no proof he cheated against cotto so all that bollocks is exactly that, bollocks. so he has to work his way back up. mosley is the main player at 147 and thas a fact right now.Comment
Comment