Pacquiao-Cotto: Gacal Says Deal Has To Be 65-35

[zzat]

65 -35, I don't think that's fair for Cotto. He's going down to 145 and his belt is on the line. It should be 60-40.

[kocface]

65 35 is FAIR!! i was in vegas for the pac hatton fight. MGM, MANDALAY, THOMAS & MACK etc... arenas were all SOLD OUT!!! for all u fools who never been to vegas for a SUPERFIGHT, all arenas where the fight is not has big ass Projection screens airing the fight. PAC AND HATTON HAVE MAAAAAAAD FANS, and vegas was PACKED every arena! most hatton fans filled the fight, but the other arenas were mostly pac fans.What u watch on PPV aren not the only ppl in attendance. 65 35 is FAIR, COTTO ISNTA DRAW LIKE PACQUIAO.

[Quarty]

HA, never mind knocking pacquiao out, when you can't even knocked out a girly malinaggi with a broken jaw. Cotto has too much problem with speedy fighter, even zab could beat the **** out him if he had the mental toughness. At least Paquiao don't need "Gomez or Jennings" to built his confidence. Paquiao slap this cotto ass in diaper in 6 rounds easy, why ? well cos pacman will land at will from 6 to 12, he is stronger & stronger in later rounds while cotto will start to fade. Cotto will be on his knee if get too much pressure of punchs, ask Magarito & nov 14 cotto will on his knee again !

BY THE WAY, DID YOUR MAMA HAD COUPLE OF BLACK *****S WICH IS MADE IN CHINA TOO !

[Quarty]

HA, never mind knocking pacquiao out, when you can't even knocked out a girly malinaggi with a broken jaw. Cotto has too much problem with speedy fighter, even zab could beat the **** out him if he had the mental toughness. At least Paquiao don't need "Gomez or Jennings" to built his confidence. Paquiao slap this cotto ass in diaper in 6 rounds easy, why ? well cos pacman will land at will from 6 to 12, he is stronger & stronger in later rounds while cotto will start to fade. Cotto will be on his knee if get too much pressure of punchs, ask Magarito & nov 14 cotto will on his knee again !

BY THE WAY, DID YOUR MAMA HAD COUPLE OF BLACK *****S WICH IS MADE IN CHINA TOO !

[Ministopped]

Pac needs Cotto more than Cotto needs Pac, this **** ain't about money, it's about LEGACY and even though Pac's is already written, a win over Cotto would be legendary, too bad Cotto gonna TKO his ass

What a legendary idiot..

[JAS_JAS]

how about fightin the #
1,3,4,6, and 8 of the welterweight top 10
and beating 1,3,6, and 8 is something for you??

you want to compare resume dude? try again your cotto's will look like **** compared to PAC's

[Ministopped]

is beating oscar better than beating shane? it's not cotto's fault that oscar was scared to fight him

First class moron..Oscar wanted Cotto first but he got his ass busted by Margarito..That's how the fight with Manny happened..

[JAS_JAS]

So what. It was in a classic fight. A lot of people think Pac didn't deserve the JMM rematch. So whats your point?

Cotto deserves it because he's been fighting all the best and beating them w/ the exception of 1.

who did cotto defeat convincingly in the top 10 pound for pound to earn more than 35%? dont say mosely, it was a draw, he got a gift from MSG.

[JAS_JAS]

LOL....Your an idiot Malignaggi obviously lost that fight and left with a broken orbital bone and a trip to the hospital. Your an obvious Cotto hater pulling 'facts' out your ass. BTW all of the 'elites' Cotto has faced (Mosely, Clottey) have never been dominated but he still pulled out the W's and did so against Clottey with one eye practically.

when did clottey become an elite?

[JAS_JAS]

i agree with you,im a pinoy a big fan of pacman but i dont like that trend of jumping weight and avoiding other champions and making excuses that they don't have the draw of money fights,if im not mistaken he's not yet to defend any belts that he won since the jumping jacks,i like him to stay in 1 weight and take all the belts unified them that's the only thing that he never done rather than cherrypicks a handicapped fights......lol

you obviously dont know ****, fighting bigger and stronger men is cherrypicking? ****ing idiot.