Fernando Vargas or Miguel Cotto?

[WhoreUs]

Quartey and Wright were very solid wins...

Marquez and Castellejo were still around only about a year ago, too, despite being about 40. they were good fighters.
Campas was a good win back then too.

people forget yory boy was top ranked at 147 and 154.

he was like 50 and 0 before tito and vargas beat him.

[Sin City]

And the difference between them is when Cotto stepped up he won. And lets not get into debate about that bull**** Margarito fight because no one knows if that **** was packing or not. I believe he was but lets just leave that fight out of the picture for now.

the difference is Vargas was rushed in to hard fights too young. he was like 22 when he fought Tito..
& Tito had trouble with the young guy, he even had to low blow 50+ times to win the fight.
Could you imagine Cotto fighting Tito or Oscar in 2002? the same thing would have happened to him and his career.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Did he even beat Wright? I heard Wright was robbed, I never seen the fight though... If it was a close fight then I personally don't consider it a robbery, I thought I just seen a few Wright fans on here claiming Wright was robbed.

What, like Clottey was?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

true ****, I dont really like the guy but can't help but wonder what he could've been.
he got the worst of the worst managment team (Main Events) & that's what cost him his career..

they thought Tito wasnt gonna be able to carry his power to '54 and they wanted to one-up oscar...after that first left hook in the 1st round, his career would never be the same

[ACHlLLES]

What, like Clottey was?

If it was close its not a robbery.

[Steak]

Did he even beat Wright? I heard Wright was robbed, I never seen the fight though... If it was a close fight then I personally don't consider it a robbery, I thought I just seen a few Wright fans on here claiming Wright was robbed.

eh, well, it was a close fight. I wouldnt call it a robbery, but yes, quite controversial.
I believe I had Winky winning it though.

the Quartey win is indisputable though.

[biglou88]

I think Vargas did by a little, he fought De la hoya, Mosley, Trinidad, Quartey in their prime.

[eazy_mas]

Cotto is just a new buzz hype.

Vargas is better than Cotto. If they fought prime vs prime Vargas would win Cotto.

If Tito had hard time to crack him down and Tito is much more powerful puncher than Cotto ever will be. So imagine if Vargas coming foward and not effected by Cotto's punchs that much.

People who been watching boxing for some time would know how good is Vargas but for people who just recently watched boxing would say Cotto is better.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

the difference is Vargas was rushed in to hard fights too young. he was like 22 when he fought Tito..
& Tito had trouble with the young guy, he even had to low blow 50+ times to win the fight.
Could you imagine Cotto fighting Tito or Oscar in 2002? the same thing would have happened to him and his career.

Feroz didnt have the luxury of being 'babied' at '40 like cotto was...he fought yory boy for a title in like his 13th(?) fight or some **** like that


out of the AMs and straight into the fire for him

[F-22 Raptor]

come on mr pink your turning into perros now, stop hating on cotto so much. COTTO is better because he's beaten the BETTER OPPOSITION. vargas is like oscar, his biggest fights all losses. vargas is the worst underachiever besides zab judah i think.