Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hopkins To Return in January? Against Froch or Adamek?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I fucking hate article titles that have question marks in them.

    Goodbye.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View Post
      Is that what you call the Undisputed CW champ turning down a paltry 500K offer, when Adamek is clearly the bigger live draw?

      Anyway, Hopkins had a 14 month layoff between Tarver and Wright, didn't seem to hurt him too bad. He schools Froch at this point, Adamek would be a lot closer.
      Dude, the guy is 45...

      14 month lay off a few years back was pushing it, let alone now.

      I don't know, at 45, after such a long time, Froch should be able to take him with his Youth.

      He will probably learn from the mistakes Pavlik made.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by vitali1999 View Post
        IMO huh? Yeah IMO IMO, did you see Hopkins Echols 2. If you saw the shot he took from Echols then you would not be writing that, IMO. Hopkins, way better chin, not just his defense.
        I said imo once. Calm down you utter ******. I did see the shot he took from Echols. But I've seen the shots Froch has taken from Pascal and Taylor. Damn you're ******ed. HUH? HUH HUH HUH? HUH? HUH HUH? See how ******ed you look now.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View Post
          Is that what you call the Undisputed CW champ turning down a paltry 500K offer, when Adamek is clearly the bigger live draw?

          Anyway, Hopkins had a 14 month layoff between Tarver and Wright, didn't seem to hurt him too bad. He schools Froch at this point, Adamek would be a lot closer.
          I thought "undisputed" meant he had all the major belts?? Last time I checked he only had the IBF!!!

          Comment


          • #45
            he would still beat both guys,guarantee

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by TEDetc View Post
              He went down but on ***** street? uhh. I seem to recall Froch taking more power shots on his chin in his 25 fight professional career than Hopkins ever has. Pointing out Froch going down from a solid punch then getting back up from it doesn't really prove much. Frochs chin is proven granite, Hopkins has never been hit like that before...because his defence is too good.

              Hopkins > Froch, but chin wise? It goes to Froch for me.
              Uh yeah, it proves he got knocked down from a punch to the face, and he went down pretty hard.

              To say Hopkins has never been punched like that then obviously you haven't been following much of hopkins career. Hopkins is a defensive master these days but not that long ago he was much more offensively minded and was open at times and did eat some big shots. His face don't look like that for nothin!

              If hopkins took that exact same shot from Jermaine Taylor no way he goes down.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by TEDetc View Post
                I said imo once. Calm down you utter ******. I did see the shot he took from Echols. But I've seen the shots Froch has taken from Pascal and Taylor. Damn you're ******ed. HUH? HUH HUH HUH? HUH? HUH HUH? See how ******ed you look now.
                Pascal and Taylor, no way near as big of punchers as Echols, ****en ****** huh ? huh? hahhaha IMO IMOIMO IMO IMO.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
                  Uh yeah, it proves he got knocked down from a punch to the face, and he went down pretty hard.

                  To say Hopkins has never been punched like that then obviously you haven't been following much of hopkins career. Hopkins is a defensive master these days but not that long ago he was much more offensively minded and was open at times and did eat some big shots. His face don't look like that for nothin!

                  If hopkins took that exact same shot from Jermaine Taylor no way he goes down.
                  It wasn't just that punch that led to him going down, did you happen to notice the 2 other beastly punches he walked right into proceeding that? He also got up pretty clear headed from the looks of things aswell, don't see how that's *****-street. As for your "if Hopkins would of" he wasn't though, so we'll never know. Froch has a great chin. I've seen Hopkins younger days aswell he has a good chin but I haven't seen it tested to the extent Frochs has been.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by TEDetc View Post
                    It wasn't just that punch that led to him going down, did you happen to notice the 2 other beastly punches he walked right into proceeding that? He also got up pretty clear headed from the looks of things aswell, don't see how that's *****-street. As for your "if Hopkins would of" he wasn't though, so we'll never know. Froch has a great chin. I've seen Hopkins younger days aswell he has a good chin but I haven't seen it tested to the extent Frochs has been.
                    Echols hit harder than taylor, as did Trinidad at 160.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Hop will give you people one more legendary fight before he bows out, set your dvd players now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP