I'm not convinced Cotto won

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Butterball
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 1303
    • 196
    • 190
    • 4,380

    #21
    Originally posted by 120
    (witch was a REALLy bad cut btw)
    "which", not witch.

    Comment

    • 120
      Lords of BoxingScene
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 6264
      • 416
      • 799
      • 13,757

      #22
      Originally posted by Butterball
      I've heard people do that, Clegg. ****ing weirdos, ain't they?

      Personally I always score the fight by who looks owned the most at the end of the fight.

      rriiiiggghhttttt

      Comment

      • 120
        Lords of BoxingScene
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 6264
        • 416
        • 799
        • 13,757

        #23
        Originally posted by Butterball
        "which", not witch.
        typo thank you

        Comment

        • Clegg
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 24674
          • 3,726
          • 2,307
          • 233,274

          #24
          Originally posted by Butterball
          I've heard people do that, Clegg. ****ing weirdos, ain't they?

          Personally I always score the fight by who looks owned the most at the end of the fight.
          Yeah, that's a good criteria. I also score based upon being flashy. Knockdowns are overrated IMO, if you want a 10-8 round you have to drop your hands, shoulder roll, or at least have a stylish entrance with fireworks and **** like that.

          Comment

          • Butterball
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 1303
            • 196
            • 190
            • 4,380

            #25
            Originally posted by 120

            rriiiiggghhttttt
            Let's be real here... who looked most like a winner in their entrance? Cotto just walked in, Clottey did a little dance.

            Clottey = robbed, clearly.

            Comment

            • Butterball
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2008
              • 1303
              • 196
              • 190
              • 4,380

              #26
              Originally posted by Clegg
              Yeah, that's a good criteria. I also score based upon being flashy. Knockdowns are overrated IMO, if you want a 10-8 round you have to drop your hands, shoulder roll, or at least have a stylish entrance with fireworks and **** like that.
              What, they lose a point for being knocked down? What does that have to do with compubox stats? You're losing me now brother.

              Comment

              • AssasinKing
                UNITED
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 5968
                • 169
                • 116
                • 13,253

                #27
                Originally posted by vaborikua
                no ko but a knockdown from cotto to clottey. also punchstats dont always tell stories in fights cause its like this: u hit me with 40 punches in round 1 and i land 4. then every round after that u land 1 and i land 2 your still going to have the advantage on landed punches but didnt do enough in the rest of the rounds.
                its true...i remmember 1 round clottey landed something like 28 or whtever...and cotto landed 7 or so....and there were a few rounds cotto really wasnt throwing anything, he looked so tired..

                but i still had him winning by 1 point...wouldnt be suprised if clottey had won or if it was a draw

                Comment

                • 120
                  Lords of BoxingScene
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 6264
                  • 416
                  • 799
                  • 13,757

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Clegg
                  Yeah, that's a good criteria. I also score based upon being flashy. Knockdowns are overrated IMO, if you want a 10-8 round you have to drop your hands, shoulder roll, or at least have a stylish entrance with fireworks and **** like that.
                  it's a terrible criteria, in this case the only thing that cotto had was the cut, from a headbutt. besides that he was fine. So, would u judge by who look worst with the cuts and swells coming from headbutts, elbows, etc?

                  Comment

                  • Jim Jeffries
                    rugged individualist
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 20741
                    • 1,376
                    • 2,868
                    • 54,838

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Butterball
                    I've heard people do that, Clegg. ****ing weirdos, ain't they?

                    Personally I always score the fight by who looks owned the most at the end of the fight.
                    That might be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard Kellerman say. Something like Clottey feels like the winner, and Cotto looks like the loser. No sht Max, he got his head split open early in the fight by a headbutt.

                    Comment

                    • 120
                      Lords of BoxingScene
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 6264
                      • 416
                      • 799
                      • 13,757

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Butterball
                      Let's be real here... who looked most like a winner in their entrance? Cotto just walked in, Clottey did a little dance.

                      Clottey = robbed, clearly.
                      he sacrificed a chicken in the locker room, i guess that would make him a champion right there.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP