it's a terrible criteria, in this case the only thing that cotto had was the cut, from a headbutt. besides that he was fine. So, would u judge by who look worst with the cuts and swells coming from headbutts, elbows, etc?
it's a terrible criteria, in this case the only thing that cotto had was the cut, from a headbutt. besides that he was fine. So, would u judge by who look worst with the cuts and swells coming from headbutts, elbows, etc?
Of course dude. If you get owned then you should just hop aboard that failboat, no point making it worse by crying about elbows and plaster and **** like that. You have a weird way of judging fights bro, glad I could help you out.
A close fight will always be controversial regardless of who the winner is. I had the fight scored 6 rounds for Cotto, 5 for Clottey, 1 even and an extra point for the knockdown for Cotto, giving Cotto a 2 point victory...
no clottey won the fight.....he landed 43 more punches than cotto...how do u loose if u landed more and there was no KO?,....anyway yeah....that was bullsh**
clottey was winning the fight until round 9 onwards, he stopped throwing punchs and virtually gifted cotto rounds 9 thru 12.
Cotto took the first round.......Clottey tooks the next 2........Cotto got rd 4.......Clottey took the fifth........Cotto took the sixth(his BEST round)......Clottey took the next 5 rounds........and Cotto ran and pop-shotted his way to get the 12th........115-113 Clottey or 8 rounds to 4!!!
Of course dude. If you get owned then you should just hop aboard that failboat, no point making it worse by crying about elbows and plaster and **** like that. You have a weird way of judging fights bro, glad I could help you out.
it's the internets judging devise. so clottey was the winnar then?
Comment