I'm not convinced Cotto won

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FaceThePain
    Amateur
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 20
    • 3
    • 1
    • 6,037

    #11
    Originally posted by Butterball
    Good thread man, I was looking for a discussion on this topic and couldn't find one.
    Here's your bottle now.

    Comment

    • Clegg
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 24674
      • 3,726
      • 2,307
      • 233,274

      #12
      Originally posted by Wyson
      no clottey won the fight.....he landed 43 more punches than cotto...how do u loose if u landed more and there was no KO?,....anyway yeah....that was bullsh**
      Spot on.

      Any one who knows boxing will tell you that landing 43 more punches equals a 118-110 victory. Shame he didn't land another 12 extra, or it would've been a shut out.

      I dunno what the fuck was up with Lederman's card. Why was he scoring the fight round by round? Crazy bastard

      Comment

      • Bobby Shaw
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 4308
        • 236
        • 29
        • 39,810

        #13
        Originally posted by FaceThePain
        A judge scored it 116-111 for Cotto! 116-111? I'm gonna have to watch this again.
        Clottey would have never won that fight even if he had knocked Cotto out.116-111 just shows someone had been paid to mess up this fight.

        Comment

        • Butterball
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 1303
          • 196
          • 190
          • 4,380

          #14
          Originally posted by The Gully Gad
          There were times i thought we were gonna get another Margarito repeat..
          So did I, but we didn't. At the end of the day (c. Calzaghe) if you're ****** enough to give rounds away in a close fight where you're already been KD'd then you don't deserve the win.

          Comment

          • Butterball
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 1303
            • 196
            • 190
            • 4,380

            #15
            Originally posted by FaceThePain
            Here's your bottle now.
            **** man, you had me rolling with that comeback. How'd you think 'em up?

            Comment

            • jmmfan
              Interim Champion
              • Aug 2008
              • 724
              • 45
              • 120
              • 6,894

              #16
              I had Clottey winning myself, but even so I think Cotto deserved the nod just for how he performed with that awful cut. No real problems here, definitely no robbery. Props to both fighters for sure.

              Comment

              • Butterball
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 1303
                • 196
                • 190
                • 4,380

                #17
                Originally posted by Clegg
                Spot on.

                Any one who knows boxing will tell you that landing 43 more punches equals a 118-110 victory. Shame he didn't land another 12 extra, or it would've been a shut out.

                I dunno what the fuck was up with Lederman's card. Why was he scoring the fight round by round? Crazy bastard
                I've heard people do that, Clegg. ****ing weirdos, ain't they?

                Personally I always score the fight by who looks owned the most at the end of the fight.

                Comment

                • baracuda
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 10779
                  • 259
                  • 569
                  • 11,470

                  #18
                  114/113 for cotto...it would've been a draw w/o the kd....imo

                  Comment

                  • 120
                    Lords of BoxingScene
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 6264
                    • 416
                    • 799
                    • 13,757

                    #19
                    116-111 was kinda exaggerated. BUT!!!

                    Here's the thing, Cotto WAS the defending champion, after the cut(which was a REALLy bad cut btw) he changed tactics yet continued fighting when he didn't have to. He could have simply said he couldn't continue and it would have gone to the cards and Cotto would have won there and then.

                    Now, BECAUSE he decided to continue fighting 'till the end the judges will give him a plus just for that. They KNOW that he can't simply engage in order to protect the cut. A judge won't just look for one thing, in this case being an aggressive fighter coming forward. Cotto WAS getting points because he was protecting the cut and was continuing to engage. Like in the round where cotto had clottey in the ropes and was landing really good, where it even seemed like clottey was dizzy. he wasn't even throwing anything back so u can count that 10-8. A judge will look for many different things, much more when u are a champion and are fighting tactically.
                    Last edited by 120; 06-14-2009, 07:35 AM.

                    Comment

                    • 120
                      Lords of BoxingScene
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 6264
                      • 416
                      • 799
                      • 13,757

                      #20
                      another thing is THE FACT, that Clottey lost the championship rounds and started acting up. Cotto won the fight, it was very close but he won it because of the KD on the first.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP