Unless mayweather is rusty: Marquez gets a worse beating then gatti..here's why

[Spacey1991]

JMM isnt getting Gatti'd by anybody.

I cant see it being so dominate like the Gatti performance that **** was unreal..

JMM is far to good for that surely

Agreed...

[THE REED]

Well to me figures of speach all have flaws when you really break them down. There can be a first time fore everything works also, in fact you are probably right that it actually ends up fitting better, but to me the statement works as is aslong as the person that says it realizes that it is not a sure thing but only a possibility, it really depends on what the person is trying to say.

So when I replied to "There IS a first time for everything" with "Actually there isn't"

I was not out of line correct? Because you cannot say something WILL happen... you can only say it CAN happen.

[THE REED]

I am sure he meant, Anything can happen.

I just didnt agree with the phrase There IS a first time for everything.

[The Gambler1981]

So when I replied to "There IS a first time for everything" with "Actually there isn't"

I was not out of line correct? Because you cannot say something WILL happen... you can only say it CAN happen.

Well, I look at the statment differently then you do so we are unlikely to really agree 100% (even though our views are similar), but I have not real issue with your stance.

Even if I strongly disagreed (which I really do not) I can't say you would be wrong, could only disagree.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

So when I replied to "There IS a first time for everything" with "Actually there isn't"

I was not out of line correct? Because you cannot say something WILL happen... you can only say it CAN happen.

its like a gay guy asking to put his pecker in your ****** and you telling him, that will never happen....then he says, there's a fight time for everything




vinny pazienza

[Vivid Intent]

JMM >>>>>>>>>>>> shot Gatti (or any version)

I still think Mayweather is going to dominate this fight but if it's a Gatti type whooping I'll be susrprised, JMM is too good to get beat like that.

[THE REED]

8 Pages later.... wow.

[The Gambler1981]

8 Pages later.... wow.

I said a couple pages ago we were only arguing semantics at that point, and that our views were not that different.

To me it is all about the intent of what the person is trying to get across, if someone used that stamement saying something will happean, they would be making the mistake we were talking about to begin with.

Saying something will happean is just as wrong as saying something will not (with no room for unexpected outcomes).

[THE REED]

I said a couple pages ago we were only arguing semantics at that point, and that our views were not that different.

To me it is all about the intent of what the person is trying to get across, if someone used that stamement saying something will happean, they would be making the mistake we were talking about to begin with.

Saying something will happean is just as wrong as saying something will not (with no room for unexpected outcomes).

Yeah... I never argued "something will not"... i only argued against the fact that "something WILL"

[-MAKAVELLI-]

"....and after 12 rounds of boxing....we go to the cards...judge duane ford has it 118-110...judge bert clement has it 118-110 and judge julie lederman has it 114-114...for the winner by majority decision...and STILL....undisputed, NSB champ of the wooooooooorrrrllllldddddd....Reed 'there is no first time for everything......****ulous...."