Unless mayweather is rusty: Marquez gets a worse beating then gatti..here's why

[THE REED]

Replace "is not" with "most likely not" and we have no issue.

I don't need too... that's why the word "always" is there.

[THE REED]

Still to me it looks like you are saying there is no possibility for that outcome~.

Because saying there is a first time for everything... is saying that every fighter will eventually lose... no matter what.

And that isnt true. I have provided proof.

[QUID]

Just to let you all know, I think JMM is gonna KO Floyd.

[The Gambler1981]

Because saying there is a first time for everything... is saying that every fighter will eventually lose... no matter what.

And that isnt true. I have provided proof.

Still, there is the possibility of this happeaning in the fight, so saying there is a first time for everything regarding a fight that has yet to take place, is not a wrong statement~.

Comparing the past to the future is not the same~.

[THE REED]

Still, there is the possibility of this happeaning in the fight, so saying there is a first time for everything regarding a fight that has yet to take place, is not a wrong statement~.

Comparing the past to the future is not the same~.

Then he should of said... anything is possible.. and i would have agreed.

Saying there IS a first time for EVERYTHING.

Is not true.


If we were having this discussion in the middle of Marciano's career, and you were to say he will lose, there is a first time for everything. You would have been wrong.

[The Gambler1981]

Then he should of said... anything is possible.. and i would have agreed.

Saying there IS a first time for EVERYTHING.

Is not true.


If we were having this discussion in the middle of Marciano's career, and you were to say he will lose, there is a first time for everything. You would have been wrong.

You do not get it your comparison is ****ty and meaningless. You are comparing a KNOWN quantity to and UNKNOWN quantity, It is a possibility nothing more~.

Saying there is not a first time for everything is the exact same as saying there is always a first time for everything.

[THE REED]

"anything can happen" is not the same as "There IS a first time for everything"


One is assuming the possibility.... one is assuming it will happen no matter what.

[joseph5620]

Speculation.

All we KNOW is... he retired undefeated.

There wasnt a first time for it.

So there isnt ALWAYS a first time for everything.

Reed makes some very good points here LOL

[THE REED]

You do not get it your comparison is ****ty and meaningless. You are comparing a KNOWN quantity to and UNKNOWN quantity, It is a possibility nothing more~.

Saying there is not a first time for everything is the exact same as saying there is always a first time for everything.

It isn't ****ty.

You cannot say "There IS a first time for everything"

You are assuming things that havent happened yet yourself.



I am not comparing Marcianos career, which has ended, and we know the outcome already... to Marquez's fight that hasnt happened yet.



What I am saying is... lets for ***sake, say that we are back in marciano's time.

And you said to me... Marciano will lose... "There is a first time for everything"

You would have been wrong.




There is not ALWAYS a first time for everything. I dont know how you can argue otherwise.

[The Gambler1981]

"anything can happen" is not the same as "There IS a first time for everything"


One is assuming the possibility.... one is assuming it will happen no matter what.

This conversation is getting nowhere fast~, look there is a possibility that JMM gets Gatti's is that likely maybe yes, maybe no, who the **** knows. I am not saying it will happean or a saure thing, I am just saying there is a possibility thus a statement like "there is a first time for everything" is not out of line.


When discussing something that has yet to even take place, all you can talk is possabilities.