I dont understand what you mean by "big name" If you mean as in fighters he has fought and beat then i see alot of names. Hector Camacho, Oba Carr, Pernell Whitaker, ODLH, David Reid, Fernando Vargas and alot of others. Everyone talks **** about how he lost to DLH but it was a draw, even Larry Merchants card had it that way 114-114. So the only lose he ever had was against the best pound for pound fighter in boxing and maybe one of the top 3 middleweights ever. So i dont understand why there is even any discussion Trinidads name or record being "Tarished" because of 2 fights
Larry Merchant scores even rounds on a 10 point system
What I meant by what I said in the previous page was that you aren't judged solely on who you beat. Yes a win is a win, but the performance you put on in the ring is what experts marvel at and rank fighters by. Look at Rocky Marciano..he retired undefeated and beat the person who is at the top of list of greatest heavyweights of all time...yet because he wasn't as complete a fighter as fighters who rank above him (as well as the fact of his opposition) he isn't looked at as being all that great...
Tito can beat Hopkins. You can see in their fight that Hopkins is really moving. He respect Tito's power. Tito just didn't use his other skills that fight. He should also learn to move and use exact defense. Try to find a hole on Hopkins. I think Tito can KO Hopkins.
Comment