Wladimir Klitschko is better off Fighting Ruslan Chagaev
Collapse
-
Good article.
Chagaev represents a bigger challenge and a tougher fight than Haye.
Ruslan is undefeated and has never been down in a fight, while Haye was knocked down even by super middleweight Mock. He's defeated three Ring top ten heavyweights (Valuev, Virchis and Ruiz) while Haye has defeated none, and won a world title at heavyweight.Comment
-
-
Chagaev represents a bigger challenge and a tougher fight than Haye.
Ruslan is undefeated and has never been down in a fight, while Haye was knocked down even by super middleweight Mock. He's defeated three Ring top ten heavyweights (Valuev, Virchis and Ruiz) while Haye has defeated none, and won a world title at heavyweight.
Stats, KDs and opponents don't make up for the fact that Chags is a boring fighter and looks like crap in the ring - whereas Haye, for all his fundamental flaws, always came to make a fight exciting. Gamboa gets knocked down all the time, but most of us fight fans adore the guy for coming to FIGHT.
So, as *****-like as it may seem that Haye's gone and injured himself, it's still a majorly raw deal for boxing that us true fans never got to see THE fight everyone wanted. Wlad facing Chags is like a really lame consolation prize. Not a fan-friendly fight, however you look at it.Comment
-
Well because the “Champion in Recess” Chagaev was unable to defend against the “Regular” champion Valuev this past weekend due to his reoccurring Hepatitis issue. To be honest, if there is a possibility of contracting the disease in the ring, I can’t blame any fighter for being hesitant to face him. [details]Comment
-
As far as bringing clarity to the heavyweight division, this is the better fight. But as a fight itself, from an entertainment standpoint and from a competitive standpoint, I think this will be worse, stylistically, this fight has all the makings for a stinker, possibly a one sided stinker.
And although Barrett is no great shakes, he's certainly better than Skelton, and Chagaev made very hard work of beating Skelton.Last edited by Dave Rado; 06-05-2009, 10:12 AM.Comment
-
So your telling everyone that u would **** up your own brother, possibly kill him or him kill you just so fans can have one champ, rather than share the belts, u either don't have a brother or if u do, your one ****ed up individual. I have brothers, there's no way i would ever fight one of them, and certainly not in the ring where many fighters have been killed or seriously injured.Comment
-
Aww, get a grip crybaby.
No siblings here, but that's not my problem. I pay to watch these fights (streams have pissed me off lately), so I expect to see THE BEST fight THE BEST. Who's THE BEST? Wlad and Vitali.
Everyone's up in arms about Chags and Valuev sharing a belt, but what about the brothers who seem to want to share the division? I'd rather see one man be THE BEST instead of two men.
I guarantee you that most true boxing fans think the same.Comment
-
I don't know any who did. Most had physical fights but in their fights they certainly didn't go all out to physically hurt each other, they were really just wrestling matches in which no one got hurt; and by the time they were adults, if they were at all close, they would never have dreamed of trying to hurt each other, even in anger in the heat of the moment, never mind doing it in a calculated way for money, the idea of which would make them sick. The idea of that, to me, is like bear baiting - it's just a freak show and doesn't belong in a civilized society.Comment
-
Granted, the brothers don't have to fight by obligation of sanctioning bodies or other organisations... but for the sake of boxing, it's just disappointing that they're so quick to dismiss the possibility of it ever happening (discounting the whole "mother-told-us-not-to" thing).
But I get what you're saying. It transcends a combat sport and becomes more about not wanting to ever step in the ring with someone you've known and loved your whole life. Guess some of us have got to let it go.Comment
Comment