That what all the Klitschko haters will be calling Haye after he gets KOed.
Like the Calzaghe hates did to Lacy, like the Wlad haters did to Brock and all the others.
Answer the question. How do you rate Haye right now?
You can't call him a bum now and then expect people to respect Wlad for knocking him out. I'll be angry if you suddenly proclaim the victory to be great having attacked Haye for months. I don't like hypocrisy. Set the record straight here.
Answer the question. How do you rate Haye right now?
You can't call him a bum now and then expect people to respect Wlad for knocking him out. I'll be angry if you suddenly proclaim the victory to be great having attacked Haye for months. I don't like hypocrisy. Set the record straight here.
Even if he said something different now it would still be hypocrisy. You can't make thread after thread, dissing the **** out of someone then see the light all of a sudden when they haven't had a fight in between.
You already ruined your chances of boasting after Wlad KO's Haye (which he should).
You discredited him for MONTHS, in disgusting fashion. Actually, the same way Haye discredits Wlad. And now here you are, two weeks away, trying to pull a 180. As if we've never read your posts before.
THat's why I read this thread confused as ****... Tunney, you are trying to say we should give credit, but you just called Haye a bum yourself for 3 straight months...
Haven't you been calling Haye a bum for months now?
Yes, but others have been calling him the "savior" of the heavyweight division.
Personally, I honestly will not consider Haye one of Wlad's better wins. But those who hyped Haye should though. Thompson (never been down), Ibragimov (undefeated), Brock (undefeated) and prime McCline (19 wins in a row before Wlad), Byrd (2000 version) and Barrett (never been down before) were all better fighters than Haye.
Even the 2005 version of Sam Peter was much more dangerous, and he had a chin.
Haye is young, physically fit and hungry, and he is somewhat dangerous, since he's fast and can punch. But his skills are very overrated, and Wlad has KOed many others with much better punch resistance.
Yes, but others have been calling him the "savior" of the heavyweight division.
Personally, I honestly will not consider Haye one of Wlad's better wins. But those who hyped Haye should though. Thompson (never been down), Ibragimov (undefeated), Brock (undefeated) and prime McCline (19 wins in a row before Wlad), Byrd (2000 version) and Barrett (never been down before) were all better fighters than Haye.
Even the 2005 version of Sam Peter was much more dangerous, and he had a chin.
Haye is young and hungry, and he is somewhat dangerous, since he's fast and can punch. But Wlad has KOed many others with much better punch resistance.
So for months on end you've dissed Haye, now you've posted a thread demanding that people respect the victory if Wlad wins and now you've re-confirmed that you won't rate it as a great victory for Wlad if he wins.
I don't expect to see you proclaiming it a great victory afterwards.
Comment