What Did You Guys Think Of Rigondeaux's Pro Debut?
Collapse
-
I would go with Vasil, simply because the guy is one of the few rare amateurs that can adopt to the guys. That is besides the fact of his upper body movement, footwork and arsenal.
Dont take it as if Rigondeoux is a slouch, he is a genious in his own way and is probably gonna be closer to guys like Hopkins and maybe even sweet pea(whitaker fans, please dont kill me) but Lomachenko will be the fighter that Joe Calzaghe should have been.
Is better than this guy...
No... just no... its not even arguable...
There is a pretty large gap in both skill and athleticism blatantly apparent in favor of Rigondeaux.Comment
-
he was very impressive. very rarely do you ever see someone in their pro debut with that kind of pose and confidence. He was toying with the guy. I can only recall Gamboa and Joan Guzman looking that confident and calm and even showboating a bit that early on in their careers.
And the people saying he didn't look impressive, wtf? so sorry he didn't knock him out in 30 seconds, he did kick knock him down though in 19 seconds and the other guy landed a total of 2 punches in the entire fight. He's not a mike tyson or james kirkland, to me, he's a counter puncherComment
-
You should watch his last fights, when he is actually of legal age. Too bad theu are only available in runet. But seriously, Shawn, they dont give you Val Barker award for pretty eyes, and especially is you are one of these stinky russkies.Comment
-
-
You know who didn't get the Val Barker award? Pernell Whitaker.Comment
-
-
Rigondeaux won his first olympic gold at 19. Do you have a point?Comment
-
But just watch the fight, Lomachenko for me is the one I train and model myself at.Comment
-
Comment
Comment