Skills v.s. Resume....whats a better indicator how good a fighter truly is

[BmoreBrawler]

of course its resume. Am I supposed to take the word of armchair "experts" over the facts?

[ColtraneChanges]

Audley Harrison.

*leaves thread*

[ColtraneChanges]

*re-enters thread*

few more mentions.

Zab
07' Patriots
Current Lakers squad

*moonwalks out*

[talip bin osman]

This has probably been done before......lets do it again...........whats the litmus paper...........of how good a fighter really is....................poll to follow...............give your reason.......why........i vote resume.........skills is way subjective.........imo..........choose just one..........we know both are important....................

cmon strugs...

resume carries more weight!

donald curry is much more skilled than manny pacquiao but he is nowhere near MP in any ATG lists now does he?

even when manny never had his great 2008, he would still be higher than mr. curry in any ATG discussions IMO

[sandyvahra]

You can have skills without having a resume, but you can't have a resume without having skills.

/thread

[AKATheMack]

I do find resume important, but to base greatness solely on resume is unfair to fighters who fight in a weak era. Wlad has beaten every top fighter for years yet his resume sucks because there is nobody to really challenge him.