Skills v.s. Resume....whats a better indicator how good a fighter truly is

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VirusTI
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 726
    • 37
    • 2
    • 16,779

    #11
    I am lumping skills with physical atts.
    I figure skills is including physical, while technical would be more hopkins/wlad like.

    Comment

    • flipbjefrox
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 5175
      • 362
      • 78
      • 62,737

      #12
      how do you prove ur skills if ur competition is weak

      Comment

      • Dan...
        Fredette About It
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 7675
        • 454
        • 951
        • 19,200

        #13
        Originally posted by jreckoning
        Roy Jones is a special case. He did things wrong and got away with it because of his extraordinary athletic ability, but don't kid yourself into thinking he didn't have very good skills.

        He had a long successful amateur career and had plenty of skill.
        I understand that. WHat i was getting at is that if you restrict the definition of "skills" to purely technical skills its not like he is right up there with the greatest of the all time greats as would be the case if physical attributes were to be included in that definition.

        Comment

        • strugler
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 6311
          • 101
          • 53
          • 6,632

          #14
          Originally posted by street bully
          Skill and resume coincide. You can not go anywhere on skill alone, and you probably can not obtain an outstanding resume if you are lacking skill.
          not saying they dont coincide..........but what is a better indicator?...............................

          Comment

          • Guest
            • 0
            • 0
            • 0

            #15
            Originally posted by danc1984
            I understand that. WHat i was getting at is that if you restrict the definition of "skills" to purely technical skills its not like he is right up there with the greatest of the all time greats as would be the case if physical attributes were to be included in that definition.

            I hear ya.

            Comment

            • Silencers
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 21957
              • 505
              • 235
              • 32,983

              #16
              Definitely resume, you can look like the second coming of SRR against tomato cans.

              Comment

              • sandyvahra
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2004
                • 1451
                • 48
                • 0
                • 7,732

                #17
                ideally you need both to be a great fighter. but choosing one, resume. why? well it shows who you beat. you can have all the skills in the world but what good is it if your fighting tomato cans?

                Comment

                • No Ceiling
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 2516
                  • 113
                  • 95
                  • 3,488

                  #18
                  rocky juarez got some pretty good skills but look at him now...

                  Comment

                  • Guest
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    • 0

                    #19
                    Emmanuel Augustus has skills.

                    Lost 30 fights. Probably 25 of them legit losses.

                    And he fought life and death with some good ones but lost to some cans.

                    Comment

                    • Pullcounter
                      no guts no glory
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 42582
                      • 549
                      • 191
                      • 49,739

                      #20
                      Originally posted by strugler
                      This has probably been done before......lets do it again...........whats the litmus paper...........of how good a fighter really is....................poll to follow...............give your reason.......why........i vote resume.........skills is way subjective.........imo..........choose just one..........we know both are important....................
                      what use is skill if you don't have the resume to back it up?

                      Andre Ward has tons of skills but does he have the resume to back it up? c'mon man this is easy.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP