Floyd Mayweather: 'Marquez ain't nothing but a tune-up'

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sandyvahra
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2004
    • 1451
    • 48
    • 0
    • 7,732

    #51
    Originally posted by Al Haymon
    Floyd was always going to beat Marquez. So I understand your point. I truly do.

    But I can't blame someone for (legally) exploiting the system and stacking the deck in his favor.

    When Oscar fought FMJ, Oscar stacked everything in his favor.
    Difference is Oscar had to stack to have a chance. JMM never stood a chance from the get go. Big difference.

    Comment

    • Al Haymon
      Banned
      • Sep 2009
      • 4214
      • 159
      • 97
      • 4,818

      #52
      Originally posted by sandyvahra
      Difference is Oscar had to stack to have a chance. JMM never stood a chance from the get go. Big difference.
      Did you think that Shane was gonna KO Margarito? Pac was gonna TKO Oscar? Hopkins was gonna dominate Pavlik?

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #53
        Originally posted by sandyvahra
        Difference is Oscar had to stack to have a chance. JMM never stood a chance from the get go. Big difference.
        He did,

        His best bet was coming into the ring at 142, Mayweather being rusty and hitting the weigh in at 144. That didn't happen though.

        Comment

        • JBell11
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 1057
          • 41
          • 38
          • 7,431

          #54
          Originally posted by Al Haymon
          Floyd was always going to beat Marquez. So I understand your point. I truly do.

          But I can't blame someone for (legally) exploiting the system and stacking the deck in his favor.

          When Oscar fought FMJ, Oscar stacked everything in his favor.
          Floyd beating Marquez was irrelovant to the debate. Integrity was my point. But ok. I'll let it slide. I understand your point...the mayweather camp can definitely exploit the system.......(legally).

          Comment

          • sandyvahra
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2004
            • 1451
            • 48
            • 0
            • 7,732

            #55
            Originally posted by Al Haymon
            Did you think that Shane was gonna KO Margarito? Pac was gonna TKO Oscar? Hopkins was gonna dominate Pavlik?
            Did any of the above hold every possible advantage tangible or intangible? NO. Did Floyd? YES.

            Comment

            • sandyvahra
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2004
              • 1451
              • 48
              • 0
              • 7,732

              #56
              Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
              He did,

              His best bet was coming into the ring at 142, Mayweather being rusty and hitting the weigh in at 144. That didn't happen though.
              You can go look through my post history. Ive barked from the get go Marquez stood 0 chance and wasnt going to be competetive. I rest my case.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP