Can someone explain to me how Pacquiao's resume is better/ or comparable to Whitaker?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
btw aside from chavez......none of those guys are better than barrera and morales.Perror made a thread like this and alot of people didn't explain. The usaully, vote and then break out but I'd like for people to explain. I mean
Whitaker's resume
JLR
Hurtado
JCV
JCC
Azumah Nelson
McGirt
Haugen
DLH (Prime) (I felt he won this fight)
Pacquiao's resume
MAB 2x (His best win)
EM Lost, won the 2nd and 3rd fight (3rd fight was unnecessary)
JMM Draw, 2nd fight W (Which most people disagree with)
David Diaz (Weakest Title Holder at 135)
Ricky Hatton (Best JR WW, GREAT win)
DLH

Sasakul
Ledwaba (I still don't know who the fcuk this is, explain why he is such a good name on Pacquiao's resume)
So how could Pacquiao's resume be comparable/ or even better then Whitaker's resume?
azumah is about on their level.
marquez might be ranked higher than most of those guys you listed for pernell.
you can make an argument that pac's resume is better.Comment
-
damn tua...you almost had me convinced....almost
12.5 is the line tonight....i dont give a ****...i took itComment
-
Azumah is higher than all those guys you listed - including Barrera and Morales.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Those are 2 fights are not even notable. His best fights (or wins) are the JCC, Haugen, Mcgirt, DLH and Nelson. I definitely agree that Pernell is the better boxer, but i'd disagree that he has a better resume.
But his draw with JCC is probably pac's draw with marquez, and DLH fight (i also thought pernell won) is pac's 2nd JMM fight.Comment
-
EM my ass, ya mother fcukers acting like Zamir Raheem didn't prove he was done! I got nothing against avenging a lose but a 3rd fight? Be seriousComment
Comment