The Best of the 3 Mexican Musketeers.

[BmoreBrawler]

Its clearly JMM but lets vote just for fun.

shoot I voted Barerra before I saw that awesome last option lol.

[strugler]

El terrible....the cajones...........the skills...the chin............MAB aint even close.............

[K-Nan]

Its clearly JMM but lets vote just for fun.

Lol.. you must not have been watching boxing for long. You must have started watching right as the other two were on their way out the door.

My opinion is that Barrera and Morales are so different yet nearly equally as great.. Barrera for his versatility and his multi-phased career (from brawler to boxer-puncher), and Morales for his unrivaled heart, power and ferocity. Morales is my personal favorite just because of his ridiculous balls. He embodies what a Mexican fighter is, imo.

I will admit tho- Marquez might have the most natural talent out of the 3. But his resume doesn't boast wins over Naseem Hamed or even a prime Barrera.

[Doc Holliday]

It's hard to say cause JMM and Barrera were past their primes when they fought, and Morales never fought Marquez at all.

[JACK D. RIPPER]

Fight was alot closer, you're on drugs if you believe those scores were fair. JMM didn't dominate anyone in that fight. I like both fighters and I'm rooting for JMM against floyd, but you're absolutely insane if you think he destroyed barrera. Marquezs face never looked that ugly after a fight, Barrera was landing alot of clean punches on his face.

No drugs, I'm high on life. JMM dominated. I had it 120-108 JMM. The judges were kind to Barrera.

[K-Nan]

It's hard to say cause JMM and Barrera were past their primes when they fought, and Morales never fought Marquez at all.

Prime Morales stops Marquez in the middle rounds. No offense to Juan but he wouldn't be able to rattle Morales as Terrible zeroes in with that right hand.

[JACK D. RIPPER]

Lol.. you must not have been watching boxing for long. You must have started watching right as the other two were on their way out the door.

My opinion is that Barrera and Morales are so different yet nearly equally as great.. Barrera for his versatility and his multi-phased career (from brawler to boxer-puncher), and Morales for his unrivaled heart, power and ferocity. Morales is my personal favorite just because of his ridiculous balls. He embodies what a Mexican fighter is, imo.

I will admit tho- Marquez might have the most natural talent out of the 3. But his resume doesn't boast wins over Naseem Hamed or even a prime Barrera.

Been watching boxing since 95'. And natural talent is what the poll is. Resume's are not indicative because not everyone has the same matchmaker. Top Rank totally ignored both Marquez bros. while they were there and its not fair to judge them because of that.
Besides JMM's wins against Packy, Diaz, Barrera and Casa make up for lost time.

[Jean28]

I like Marquez more. He seems to have more heart and also seems more of a warrior.

[Obusv477]

Erik Morales has that win over Pac....thread closed.

[Suspadres]

Lol.. you must not have been watching boxing for long. You must have started watching right as the other two were on their way out the door.

My opinion is that Barrera and Morales are so different yet nearly equally as great.. Barrera for his versatility and his multi-phased career (from brawler to boxer-puncher), and Morales for his unrivaled heart, power and ferocity. Morales is my personal favorite just because of his ridiculous balls. He embodies what a Mexican fighter is, imo.

I will admit tho- Marquez might have the most natural talent out of the 3. But his resume doesn't boast wins over Naseem Hamed or even a prime Barrera.

Naseem Hamed was ducking Juan and he's terribly overrated anyway. Juan woulda whooped his ass just like Barrera did.