Emmanuel Pacquiao ,a quantitative view

[aether]

Morales was a legend too. No shame in losing to a legend especially since he destroyed him the next go around.

yeah.. pac has great wins over legends. and the way he just destroyed them is amazing. call it nut hugging or whatever but pac has had an impressive carreer. all he's doing now is adding to his greatness. floyd on the other hand has been questioned about his greatness...

****. this two must fight to settle this

[aether]

I dunno why the **** Mr boat buyer's ****suckers are ****tin on Pac all the time. He's the reason Mr boat buyer came back. For all the bitchin they do about their hero not gettin any cred for his wins, they doin a good job makin his desired big $ opponent out to be ****.

yeah man. if i was them, id be hyping pac to no end, considering floyd's style, he should be favored againts pac.

i'll bet on pac though

[Bobby Shaw]

Nobody seems to talk about Baldomir's 11 losses and 6 draws before he became lineal champ (for beating exactly 1 good opponent).

So why pick on Manny?

He fights, and fights often.....


Lewis avenged his losses. Pac avenged his meaningful ones. He avenged the draw too.


This quantitative view **** sounds like it was inspired by boxrec.

And his greatest wins are against people Floyd finished off.
DelaHoya wasnt the same fighter,even Steve Forbes landed shots at will.
Hatton wasnt the same,Lazcano nearly took him out and Malignangii was another washed up feather fisted fighter after Cotto's destruction he recieved

[baracuda]

ts said 2000-2001 was the last time manny fought an undefeated fighter,2007 when he fought jorge solis!