I agree, I like Pac too but I just don't see it happening.....only time will tell. All I know is my boy Floyd will have his hands full that's for sure.
]Funny because Mayweather has only fought mostly brawlers who don't even know what the word defense means. Pacquiao and [/B]Marquez know what defense is, and its ashame Marquez is going to be too small for Floyd just like Floyd has already said.
You act like Pacman knows what defense is. He uses his legs for defense, once your on him, he has no defense with his arms and gets tagged quick by counters.
Pacquiao has a good chance, if just because he has Roach making up a gameplan. Every fighter has a weakness and there is no one better, save perhaps Nazeem Richardson at exposing them. It will have to be spot on to beat Mayweather of course, but it could happen.
I still say however, that the fighter out there best equipped to beat Mayweather is Cotto. It's a shame he'll probably never get a chance, because I think Pacquiao will beat him. As the cliche goes, styles make fights and I feel Cotto would be a nightmare for Mayweather.
Best reply thus far, and I agree Cotto Marg or Mosley (all true welterweights) have the best chance of beating Floyd.
You act like Pacman knows what defense is. He uses his legs for defense, once your on him, he has no defense with his arms and gets tagged quick by counters.
That is part of his defense genius, moving out of the way so his opponent can't punch him.
A fighter who hand picks his resume to protect his 0. A fighter who fights at 147 and avoids all the challenges at 147 like Cotto, Margacheato(before everyone knew he was a cheater), Mosley, and williams(when williams fought at 147)
Originally posted by S a m u r a i
A mouthy little brat?
Hey, I am no fan of Floyds attitude, you can catch me on any given day talkin **** on his arrogance... but in the ring, his skills cannot be overlooked, and they cannot be denied.
If you are a real boxing fan, you must appreciate his skillset in the ring.. regardless of his attitude outside of it.
marquez gets little underestimated here doncha think?
Firstly, yes I am being slightly unfair to JMM by writing this thread now, but I am reading a lot of threads about how Pac will beat Floyd so I decided to throw in my two cents.
Secondly, I think Floyd would fight Pac even if he lost to JMM.
A fighter who hand picks his resume to protect his 0. A fighter who fights at 147 and avoids all the challenges at 147 like Cotto, Margacheato(before everyone knew he was a cheater), Mosley, and williams(when williams fought at 147)
now list the fighters joke calslappy ducked, it will make mayweather look great
seriously tho, u will discredit mayweather even if he wins..u just found a new fighter to nuthug so u can hate on mayweather, if he wins u will abandon the fighter who u have "new found love" for
Hey, I am no fan of Floyds attitude, you can catch me on any given day talkin **** on his arrogance... but in the ring, his skills cannot be overlooked, and they cannot be denied.
If you are a real boxing fan, you must appreciate his skillset in the ring.. regardless of his attitude outside of it.
i really respect his skills man... his accomplishments & all... but its not quite a "cant miss" thing to watch at least for me...
i rather watch barrios vs juarez than pbf vs oscar
Comment