Why did Hatton not have a rematch clause in the contract?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NakiFan
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 6971
    • 435
    • 268
    • 9,796

    #21
    I'd laugh if Hatton channeled the spirit of lennox lewis, came back and destroyed his conqurer, he isnt good enough though

    Comment

    • MR. V
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 2108
      • 157
      • 444
      • 8,796

      #22
      Originally posted by ABOSWORTH
      Seems like standard procedure in a fight like this.
      dam good question. totally forgot about that.

      Comment

      • FeFist
        No.1
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 9251
        • 576
        • 357
        • 29,695

        #23
        Putting a rematch clause in there is a psychological blow. Especially since he was training with the mentality that this would be his last shot, losing wasn't an option for him.

        I personally don't like the idea of rematch clauses, unless it is a split decision loss.

        Comment

        • vercingetorix3
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 1581
          • 73
          • 152
          • 8,356

          #24
          Because pulling a Tarver on an opponent that soundly defeated you is not cool.

          Tyson had a rematch clause with his contract for the beating he took from Lennox, but he never used it.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP