Hatton + him not being allowed to hold and hit=

**Dubious-Dutch** · 05-04-2009, 01:57 AM

Originally posted by cuzfozzy

bayliss did a good job.

I can't believe some people are using Bayless as an excuse. It really is sad.....

**cuzfozzy** · 05-04-2009, 02:01 AM

no bayliss did a good job. he kept it clean.
but pacquiao deserves all the credit

**strugler** · 05-04-2009, 02:08 AM

Originally posted by KEYNES

Rot in hell, ****man Fatton.

We hate you, mate.

you dont mean that son..............LOL.............

**brently1979** · 05-04-2009, 02:18 AM

Originally posted by oojaksoo

Maybe you should watch some fights pre Tyzu or even the Malanaggi fight

He was Terrible in the Malanaggi fight as well. He did his fair share of holding in that fight.

**Mr. Philadel** · 05-04-2009, 02:22 AM

Originally posted by Infern0

I got swallowed up by the Hatton Hype, it won't be happening again.

my man!!!......great post

**tjadl6386** · 05-04-2009, 05:51 AM

Bayless did a good job. Hatton get away with a couple of rabid punches in the fight but all in all, Pacquiao was just the better fighter that night.

**MetalVomit** · 05-04-2009, 01:55 PM

Originally posted by DeafCon

I can't believe some people are using Bayless as an excuse. It really is sad.....

Just like they used Cortez as an excuse in the Mayweather fight.

**Left Hook Tua** · 05-04-2009, 02:09 PM

Originally posted by FasTHarD

His defence is his face.

they don't call him the manchester mexican for nothing.

**MetalVomit** · 05-04-2009, 03:52 PM

Originally posted by OASIS_LAD

they don't call him the manchester mexican for nothing.

that's hilarious. i didnt know they called him that.

Comment