Will Hatton be given credit if he defeats Pacquiao?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THE REED
    Sixty Forty
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 43489
    • 1,992
    • 1,483
    • 690,068,075

    #61
    Originally posted by The Weebler II
    no not good for Ricky, he's an American ref.

    We've seen how refs change their reffing style to suit certain fighters. Pacquiao is worth more to HBO than Hatton.
    Neither fighter is American, and neither fighter lives in America.

    Comment

    • Weebler I
      El Weeblerito I
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 31113
      • 1,468
      • 1,648
      • 54,550

      #62
      Originally posted by reedickyaluss
      lol I really could give a **** about race and nationalities... it's the gods honest truth...

      I'll actually be looking forward to Froch's next fight... his lack of defense, but determination, chin and power make him exciting to me...

      although I want a taylor rematch
      any Taylor rematch will be in Nottingham, England and he'll probably be knocked out again. He's a good fighter, but not good enough to go away from home and beat a boxer with a chin and heart like Froch.

      Comment

      • THE REED
        Sixty Forty
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 43489
        • 1,992
        • 1,483
        • 690,068,075

        #63
        Originally posted by The Weebler II
        any Taylor rematch will be in Nottingham, England and he'll probably be knocked out again.
        The fight will be wherever the money is.. that is what Froch is interested in, it's exactly what he said. He wants the big names and the big money, he's 30 years and old and can't waste time.

        If he can make 3 million in England but 5 million in the US.. He will be in the U.S.

        Comment

        • Weebler I
          El Weeblerito I
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 31113
          • 1,468
          • 1,648
          • 54,550

          #64
          Originally posted by reedickyaluss
          Neither fighter is American, and neither fighter lives in America.
          no but one is worth more in terms of securing interest in a future megafight with FMJ. I wouldn't be surprised to see Bayless break them up every time they get close.

          Comment

          • THE REED
            Sixty Forty
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 43489
            • 1,992
            • 1,483
            • 690,068,075

            #65
            Originally posted by The Weebler II
            no but one is worth more in terms of securing interest in a future megafight with FMJ. I wouldn't be surprised to see Bayless break them up every time they get close.
            A Hatton fight is just as big, AND... the biggest part, a Hatton fight for Floyd is MUCH more makable then a PACMAN fight.

            Floyd and Arum hate eachother and they will not come to terms, Hatton wants his rematch, and badly.

            The Hatton fight is more doable and realistic, and if Floyd had to choose he would choose a Hatton rematch.

            Comment

            • winac
              Banned
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 507
              • 13
              • 1
              • 596

              #66
              If they try and discredit the win because of Hatton being the bigger man, they are discrediting Pacquiao's win against De La Hoya at the same time. Say their excuse is that Pacquiao is less effective at 140+ and that he shouldn't be fighting above 135, why was he able to deal with De La Hoya at 147? It wasn't like Pacquiao defeated Oscar the way Oscar did with Vargas where despite being physcially overpowered he found a way to win. So if that was a credible win why wouldn't a Hatton defeat be anything other than a massive dent to his resume

              Comment

              • THE REED
                Sixty Forty
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 43489
                • 1,992
                • 1,483
                • 690,068,075

                #67
                Originally posted by winac
                If they try and discredit the win because of Hatton being the bigger man, they are discrediting Pacquiao's win against De La Hoya at the same time. Say their excuse is that Pacquiao is less effective at 140+ and that he shouldn't be fighting above 135, why was he able to deal with De La Hoya at 147? It wasn't like Pacquiao defeated Oscar the way Oscar did with Vargas where despite being physcially overpowered he found a way to win. So if that was a credible win why wouldn't a Hatton defeat be anything other than a massive dent to his resume
                Honestly, I think Oscar's performance had more to do with Oscar then it did with Pacman... not that Pac didnt BRING IT.

                Comment

                • winac
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 507
                  • 13
                  • 1
                  • 596

                  #68
                  Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                  Honestly, I think Oscar's performance had more to do with Oscar then it did with Pacman... not that Pac didnt BRING IT.
                  Exactly but I am saying for those who try to justify it as a great win, can't be he same people who then go on to say, if Manny loses, that Manny shouldn't be fighting above 140 or make some weight excuse for the loss

                  Comment

                  • The Hammer
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 50797
                    • 3,416
                    • 8,704
                    • 58,851

                    #69
                    Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                    Honestly, I think Oscar's performance had more to do with Oscar then it did with Pacman... not that Pac didnt BRING IT.
                    So you won't be giving Hatton any credit if he wins?

                    That seems a bit ree****yaluss to me...

                    http://ryanericsongcanlas.files.word...pg?w=480&h=663

                    Comment

                    • THE REED
                      Sixty Forty
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 43489
                      • 1,992
                      • 1,483
                      • 690,068,075

                      #70
                      Originally posted by winac
                      Exactly but I am saying for those who try to justify it as a great win, can't be he same people who then go on to say, if Manny loses, that Manny shouldn't be fighting above 140 or make some weight excuse for the loss
                      Oh I agree, this is an even fight for me... not in the sense of who I think is better or who will win... but their both the same age, their both the same size GIVE OR TAKE... they are both prime... Hatton is undefeated at 140 in 43 some fights... pacman is the #1 p4p fighter...

                      The Winner gets FULL credit no matter who it is..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP