If Manny Pacquiao beats Ricky Hatton, He Will Be The Best Fighter Of Our Era

[Alibata]

why???floyd beat oscar and hatton first..so why would pacman get so much damn credit

cuz pacman will do it better!

[El Dominicano]

Anyone who disagrees is straight out crazy, racist, and out of touch with reality.

Sorry man, B-Hop is the greatest fighter of our era and if Pacquaio were to beat Hatton, B-Hop would still be the best

[mellow_mood]

Sorry man, B-Hop is the greatest fighter of our era and if Pacquaio were to beat Hatton, B-Hop would still be the best

vaya!! papa..!!

u should give me at least 25 K!


I just earn you 150K

[them_apples]

Nah Hopkins still would have a better Resume, greater longevity and he unified the titles.

Hopkins wouldn't and doesn't have a better resume, even now. He's my 2nd favorite fighter as well.

[Rocky.]

meh... i disagree

Hatton is not exactly a career highlight unless you're a B level boxer (for proof see the reaction Floyd's win over him got)

Hatton is near finished now anyway

What a ignorant post, wait till the weekend well see what youve got to say.

[El Dominicano]

vaya!! papa..!!

u should give me at least 25 K!


I just earn you 150K

I still haven't got paid. The person's name is BHON something like that...I had a feeling he wasn't the type to pay back

[LIL_KULIT808]

why???floyd beat oscar and hatton first..so why would pacman get so much damn credit

cuz he beat up odh like he never been beatin like that before!!!

[Lady Fan]

He is no doubt the best. JAT

[Benny Leonard]

cuz he beat up odh like he never been beatin like that before!!!

That's because of the circumstances of where Oscar was in that point in time in his career.

You need to stop looking just on the surface.

Maybe we should boost up the two fighters that knocked Pac out early. After all, they beat Pac like nobody has beaten him before.

[them_apples]

LOL............. Okay whatever.

I combined them to show you half the guys theyve fought. Thats half of their resume.

You must be crazy if you think wins over Mitchell, Eubank etc cement him a place in the best of this era list.

He's fought two hall of famers in Hopkins and Roy Jones. The Hopkins win was very very very close and its fair to say that Roy was shot when Joe beat him.

I'm not hating but this is the truth, Roy wasnt the Roy of the 1990's and Hopkins was 42 when Joe beat him.

Hopkins was 43, a good 43 year old as well, but Calzaghe didn't do enough to take his belt. He could have at least given him a rematch.

Jones was shot to pieces, he had been knocked out by the likes of Tarver, Johnson etc, nobody thought he stood a chance against Calzaghe at this stage. The fact that he knocked him down makes it even funnier.

Calzaghe beating Hopkins was a good win however, even if it was close either guy winning would have been fine. I just wish Calzaghe wasn't such a coward and offered rematches. He never struck me as a champion who actually wanted to prove himself.

Because Taylor beat a better version of Hopkins and did it more so convincingly, it sorta takes off Calzaghe's supposed "uber" status. The fact that Jones was knocked spark out 2 times completely negates his competative 12 round decision over Jones.

His resume doesn't come close to Pacquiao, not even a hair. Pacquiao jumped multiple weight classes and grabbed titles, fought the mexican Trio and beat them. 2 of them were in direct primes, Morales being somewhat past it.

Then there are his equivalents of Eubanks and Rieds, such as Valezquez, Ledwaba, Solis...I guess a dehydrated De La Hoya. Now he's taking on the no.1 fighter at 140 lbs..and is the betting favorite.

His tune up was David Diaz, the lw champ...