Calzaghes win over Eubank or Frochs win over Taylor which is more impressive

[Southpaw16BF]

Froch's win over Taylor, Eubank never even had a full camp for Calzaghe, taking the fight on short notice, and overall I think Taylor is the better fighter than Eubank was. And Taylor was more in his prime than Eubank was at the time.

[Hook]

Froch's win over Taylor, Eubank never even had a full camp for Calzaghe, taking the fight on short notice.

Indeed, Eubank took the fight at 11 days notice.

[IMDAZED]

Only one of the outcomes of these two fights was an upset.

[Zmlacksz]

Calzaghe was a green 25 year old and Eubank 31. That Eubank would have destroyed Froch. To slick and to much power.

[Pullcounter]

froch over taylor is a better win, but calz slaps the ***** outta froch

[Hook]

Frochs win over Taylor, all day long everyday long.

This thread is an insult to Froch's achievement.

[Hook]

Eubank at 31 was a better fighter than Taylor is right now. Calzaghe dominated Eubank for the most part, and Froch got schooled for the most part I rate the Eubank fight higher.

Pure fan boy stuff.

[Dan...]

Froch's win, easily.

Eubank was well past-prime when Joe beat him whilst Froch beat a prime elite fighter in Taylor.

Also, Taylor > Eubank, especially at 168.

[Dan...]

Eubank at 31 was a better fighter than Taylor is right now. Calzaghe dominated Eubank for the most part, and Froch got schooled for the most part. Some say Froch is lucky, but I thought he earned his victory and was very patient. Both great wins, but I rate the Eubank fight higher.

I know others have already said as much but I would like to add that that is complete garbage.

[Dubious-Dutch]

Froch's win, easily.

Eubank was well past-prime when Joe beat him whilst Froch beat a prime elite fighter in Taylor.

Also, Taylor > Eubank, especially at 168.

You believe Taylor is better than Eubank?