P4P rankings are so subjective, especially when it is as wide as a current top 25. It is all a matter of opinion, and if someone didn't have Pac as #1 for instance they would not necessarily be absolutely wrong. Cotto is certainly top 20 in my book without even thinking much about the issue.
You will find the boxers with 3 and more top ranks and the top 10 bouts in every weight division.
And you will also find the top 15 boxers of the year with their ratings and the top 10 bouts of the year with the ratings of the opponents for every weight division.
13 Top Ranks: Sugar Ray Robinson
12 Top Ranks: Ricardo Lopez
11 Top Ranks: Tommy Ryan
10 Top Ranks: Muhammad Ali, Julio Cesar Chavez, Roy Jones Jr., Azumah Nelson
9 Top Ranks: Floyd Mayweather Jr.
8 Top Ranks: Joe Goss, Joe Louis, Pernell Whitaker, Harry Wills
7 Top Ranks: Joe Calzaghe, Emile Griffith, Marvin Hagler, Virgil Hill, Peter Jackson, Jack Johnson, Benny Leonard, Carlos Monzon, Archie Moore, Jose Napoles, Jimmy Wilde
6 Top Ranks: Alexis Arguello, Tommy Gibbons, Naseem Hamed, Evander Holyfield, Larry Holmes, Bernard Hopkins, Oscar De La Hoya, Eder Jofre, Lennox Lewis, Terry McGovern, Packey McFarland, Willie Pep, Manny Pacquiao, Aaron Pryor, Vicente Saldivar, **** Tiger, Gene Tunney
Boxrecs p4p system is machine calculated, giving points for belts and wins over fighter regardless of the state. If a fighter is past prime it gives the fighter than beat him points as if he were prime. The rings ratings are the only credible ones.
Boxrecs p4p system is machine calculated, giving points for belts and wins over fighter regardless of the state. If a fighter is past prime it gives the fighter than beat him points as if he were prime. The rings ratings are the only credible ones.
So Cotto should be in the rankings with all the vacated belts he has gotten right?
Comment