Will Miguel Cotto Ever Get Inside The Top 25 Pound For Pound?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • krispy kreme
    Fiendin for toilet water
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 10832
    • 358
    • 898
    • 18,913

    #11
    Originally posted by Bhopreign
    Computers control the world.
    What I meant was a computer manages the wins and losses or something like that. It is just inaccurate.

    Comment

    • dsyef
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 212
      • 4
      • 1
      • 6,282

      #12
      He beat Mosley lost a controversial fight to Margarito and fell from most list. Now Mosley is above him despite losing many fights before. Mosley basicly jumped up the rankings after beating Margarito.

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #13
        Originally posted by Tek My Pounches
        What I meant was a computer manages the wins and losses or something like that. It is just inaccurate.
        I know what you meant, but when has Cotto beat a top 5 welterweight soundly? Yes their list looks suspect I agree, Im gonna try to find the algorithmn they are using to determine their list and see if it maks sense.

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #14
          Originally posted by dsyef
          He beat Mosley lost a controversial fight to Margarito and fell from most list. Now Mosley is above him despite losing many fights before. Mosley basicly jumped up the rankings after beating Margarito.
          I think because they go on past wins also, since Shane has beat Oscar twice, that may have something to do with it.Beating the guy who beat Cotto helps too Im sure.

          Comment

          • RL_GMA
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 10271
            • 507
            • 103
            • 26,636

            #15
            Originally posted by Bhopreign
            I think because they go on past wins also, since Shane has beat Oscar twice, that may have something to do with it.Beating the guy who beat Cotto helps too Im sure.
            So why even put this list up if you already know it's totally inaccurate? Did you even take a look at the names on this list? LOL

            Do you hate on a fighter that much that you'd take the time to try and put down his accomplishments by posting a fraud list? LOL what's the point?

            Comment

            • krispy kreme
              Fiendin for toilet water
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 10832
              • 358
              • 898
              • 18,913

              #16
              Originally posted by Bhopreign
              I know what you meant, but when has Cotto beat a top 5 welterweight soundly? Yes their list looks suspect I agree, Im gonna try to find the algorithmn they are using to determine their list and see if it maks sense.
              Who cares, he is a good welter weight who will fight anyone.

              Comment

              • Bhopreign
                Banned
                • Jun 2006
                • 11273
                • 419
                • 100
                • 12,036

                #17
                Originally posted by RL_GMA
                So why even put this list up if you already know it's totally inaccurate? Did you even take a look at the names on this list? LOL

                Do you hate on a fighter that much that you'd take the time to try and put down his accomplishments by posting a fraud list? LOL what's the point?
                Of course I saw the names, thats why I said Im going to find out how they deduce their list, its actually more bias to have a person doing the list than a computer, since the computer only works with what it is given, despite the fact the algorithmn is human produced, that might seem like an anomaly but I think its valid to say.

                Comment

                • Bhopreign
                  Banned
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 11273
                  • 419
                  • 100
                  • 12,036

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Tek My Pounches
                  Who cares, he is a good welter weight who will fight anyone.
                  He didnt want Floyd at 140.

                  Comment

                  • krispy kreme
                    Fiendin for toilet water
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 10832
                    • 358
                    • 898
                    • 18,913

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Bhopreign
                    He didnt want Floyd at 140.
                    What are you talking about? Floyd said himself Cotto was too green. I think Floyd would beat him at 140, but Cotto didn't avoid him, give me a break.

                    Comment

                    • RL_GMA
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 10271
                      • 507
                      • 103
                      • 26,636

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Bhopreign
                      Of course I saw the names, thats why I said Im going to find out how they deduce their list, its actually more bias to have a person doing the list than a computer, since the computer only works with what it is given, despite the fact the algorithmn is human produced, that might seem like an anomaly but I think its valid to say.
                      LOL so now we're gonna have this guy running Boxing's P4P list?



                      He's a computer too

                      Or maybe The Architect

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP