He was a complex human being, with good and bad aspects to his character. The programme focussed only on the bad - and grossly exaggerated them. He was certainly no saint, but nor was he the person the film pretended he was. And to pretend the stands he took on civil rights and the war were insincere, without any evidence, was just gutter journalism. And even if those claims had been true, they would have had no relevance whatsoever to telling Frazier's side of the story, which was what the film pretended to be about.
As I said before it did Frazier a disservice, because he deserves to have a film made that tells his side of the story in a genuine way, without resorting to character assassination, distortion and half truths.
As I said before it did Frazier a disservice, because he deserves to have a film made that tells his side of the story in a genuine way, without resorting to character assassination, distortion and half truths.
Comment